Literature DB >> 15671177

Partitioning between unfolding and release of native domains during ClpXP degradation determines substrate selectivity and partial processing.

Jon A Kenniston1, Tania A Baker, Robert T Sauer.   

Abstract

Energy-dependent proteases, such as ClpXP, are responsible for the regulated destruction of proteins in all cells. AAA+ ATPases in these proteases bind protein substrates and power their mechanical denaturation and subsequent translocation into a secluded degradation chamber where polypeptide cleavage occurs. Here, we show that model unfolded substrates are engaged rapidly by ClpXP and are then spooled into the degradation chamber at a rate proportional to their length. Degradation and competition studies indicate that ClpXP initially binds native and unfolded substrates similarly. However, stable native substrates then partition between frequent release and infrequent denaturation, with only the latter step resulting in committed degradation. During degradation of a fusion protein with three tandem native domains, partially degraded species with one and two intact domains accumulated. These processed proteins were not bound to the enzyme, showing that release can occur even after translocation and degradation of a substrate have commenced. The release of stable substrates and committed engagement of denatured or unstable native molecules ensures that ClpXP degrades less stable substrates in a population preferentially. This mechanism prevents trapping of the enzyme in futile degradation attempts and ensures that the energy of ATP hydrolysis is used efficiently for protein degradation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15671177      PMCID: PMC547888          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409634102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  ClpA mediates directional translocation of substrate proteins into the ClpP protease.

Authors:  B G Reid; W A Fenton; A L Horwich; E U Weber-Ban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dynamics of substrate denaturation and translocation by the ClpXP degradation machine.

Authors:  Y I Kim; R E Burton; B M Burton; R T Sauer; T A Baker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal.

Authors:  C Lee; M P Schwartz; S Prakash; M Iwakura; A Matouschek
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Effects of protein stability and structure on substrate processing by the ClpXP unfolding and degradation machine.

Authors:  R E Burton; S M Siddiqui; Y I Kim; T A Baker; R T Sauer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Proteomic discovery of cellular substrates of the ClpXP protease reveals five classes of ClpX-recognition signals.

Authors:  Julia M Flynn; Saskia B Neher; Yong In Kim; Robert T Sauer; Tania A Baker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Energy-dependent degradation: Linkage between ClpX-catalyzed nucleotide hydrolysis and protein-substrate processing.

Authors:  Randall E Burton; Tania A Baker; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Stability of the Rel homology domain is critical for generation of NF-kappa B p50 subunit.

Authors:  Li Lin; Minae Kobayashi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Alternating translocation of protein substrates from both ends of ClpXP protease.

Authors:  Joaquin Ortega; Hyun Sook Lee; Michael R Maurizi; Alasdair C Steven
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  ClpAP and ClpXP degrade proteins with tags located in the interior of the primary sequence.

Authors:  Joel R Hoskins; Katsuhiko Yanagihara; Kiyoshi Mizuuchi; Sue Wickner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Processive degradation of proteins by the ATP-dependent Clp protease from Escherichia coli. Requirement for the multiple array of active sites in ClpP but not ATP hydrolysis.

Authors:  M W Thompson; S K Singh; M R Maurizi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-07-08       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  51 in total

1.  Protein unfolding and degradation by the AAA+ Lon protease.

Authors:  Eyal Gur; Marina Vishkautzan; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  The I domain of the AAA+ HslUV protease coordinates substrate binding, ATP hydrolysis, and protein degradation.

Authors:  Shankar Sundar; Tania A Baker; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  p97 functions as an auxiliary factor to facilitate TM domain extraction during CFTR ER-associated degradation.

Authors:  Eric J Carlson; David Pitonzo; William R Skach
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Altered specificity of a AAA+ protease.

Authors:  Christopher M Farrell; Tania A Baker; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  m-AAA protease-driven membrane dislocation allows intramembrane cleavage by rhomboid in mitochondria.

Authors:  Takashi Tatsuta; Steffen Augustin; Mark Nolden; Björn Friedrichs; Thomas Langer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Single-molecule protein unfolding and translocation by an ATP-fueled proteolytic machine.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Aubin-Tam; Adrian O Olivares; Robert T Sauer; Tania A Baker; Matthew J Lang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  ATP-dependent proteases differ substantially in their ability to unfold globular proteins.

Authors:  Prakash Koodathingal; Neil E Jaffe; Daniel A Kraut; Sumit Prakash; Susan Fishbain; Christophe Herman; Andreas Matouschek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Antibacterial activity of and resistance to small molecule inhibitors of the ClpP peptidase.

Authors:  Corey L Compton; Karl R Schmitz; Robert T Sauer; Jason K Sello
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  Ligand binding modulates the mechanical stability of dihydrofolate reductase.

Authors:  Sri Rama Koti Ainavarapu; Lewyn Li; Carmen L Badilla; Julio M Fernandez
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Slippery substrates impair function of a bacterial protease ATPase by unbalancing translocation versus exit.

Authors:  Priscilla Hiu-Mei Too; Jenny Erales; Joana Danica Simen; Antonija Marjanovic; Philip Coffino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.