Literature DB >> 15036815

Equity in resource allocation in the Irish health service. A policy Delphi study.

Rosalyn O'Loughlin1, Alan Kelly.   

Abstract

Resource allocation in the Irish health service, based on historical allocations with incremental increases, is widely believed to be inequitable. Using a three-round policy Delphi survey, which seeks to explore both consensus and disagreement surrounding policy issues, the views of 52 senior health service personnel were sought in order to determine ways to improve equity in resource allocation. Panelists provided several reasons why the current method of resource allocation is inequitable and several suggestions for improving equity. The level of consensus on views was determined by calculating the percentage of ratings in each category based on a series of rating scales. The main suggestion centred around the development and implementation of a needs based resource allocation formula. Panelists reached a high consensus in favour of this but only reached a low consensus as to its feasibility. Potential obstacles identified included methodological difficulties, insufficient resources and resistance from potential losers. These findings highlight concerns about the lack of transparency in the resource allocation process and openness to the development of a more equitable needs based resource allocation model, a move which is becoming more common internationally. Feasibility concerns should not preclude an attempt to begin this process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15036815     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  7 in total

1.  Where there is no evidence: use of expert consensus methods to fill the evidence gap in low-income countries and cultural minorities.

Authors:  Harry Minas; Anthony F Jorm
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2010-12-21

2.  Research on the Equity and Influencing Factors of Medical and Health Resources Allocation in the Context of COVID-19: A Case of Taiyuan, China.

Authors:  Xueling Wu; Ye Zhang; Xiaojia Guo
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16

3.  Adverse events following cervical manipulative therapy: consensus on classification among Dutch medical specialists, manual therapists, and patients.

Authors:  Hendrikus A Kranenburg; Sandra E Lakke; Maarten A Schmitt; Cees P Van der Schans
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-05-31

4.  Identification of Thoroughbred Racehorse Welfare Issues by Industry Stakeholders.

Authors:  Glen Mactaggart; Natalie Waran; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Disentangling rhetoric and reality: an international Delphi study of factors and processes that facilitate the successful implementation of decisions to decommission healthcare services.

Authors:  Glenn Robert; Jenny Harlock; Iestyn Williams
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Rethinking workforce planning for integrated care: using scenario analysis to facilitate policy development.

Authors:  Gareth H Rees; Peter Crampton; Robin Gauld; Stephen MacDonell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Prostate cancer survivorship essentials framework: guidelines for practitioners.

Authors:  Jeff Dunn; Anna Green; Nicholas Ralph; Robert U Newton; Andrew Kneebone; Mark Frydenberg; Suzanne K Chambers
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.