Literature DB >> 15035377

Decontamination of cattle hides prior to slaughter using washes with and without antimicrobial agents.

P D Mies1, B R Covington, K B Harris, L M Lucia, G R Acuff, J W Savell.   

Abstract

Two trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of cattle wash treatments in reducing pathogens on hides of cattle before slaughter. In trial I, live cattle (n = 120) were washed in an automated, commercial cattle wash system with one of four treatments (single water wash, double water wash, water wash with 0.5% L-lactic acid, or water wash with 50 ppm chlorine). Samples were collected at three locations (brisket, belly, and inside round) pre- and posttreatment to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments on the reduction of aerobic plate counts, coliforms, Escherichia coli and the incidence of Salmonella. For all three locations, bacterial numbers increased from 0.1 to 0.8 log CFU/cm2 posttreatment. In trial II, hide samples were inoculated in the laboratory with 6.0 log CFU/cm2 of rifampicin-resistant Salmonella serotype Typhimurium. Hide wash treatments included higher concentrations of chlorine (100, 200, and 400 ppm) and L-lactic acid (2, 4, and 6%), as well as other antimicrobial agents such as ethanol (70, 80, and 90%), acetic acid (2, 4, and 6%), and Oxy-Sept 333 (0.5, 2, and 4%). Spray wash treatments with ethanol and 4 to 6% concentrations of lactic acid had greater (P < 0.05) mean log reductions than 2% solutions of acetic or lactic acid, as well as 100, 200, and 400 ppm chlorine and the control water wash treatment. Spray wash treatments with Oxy-Sept 333 and 100, 200, or 400 ppm chlorine were not effective (P > 0.05) in reducing Salmonella Typhimurium compared to the (control) distilled water spray wash treatment. Several effective cattle hide interventions were identified in a controlled laboratory setting, but the high concentrations required for effectiveness would likely present problems from an animal welfare standpoint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15035377     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.3.579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  4 in total

1.  Efficacy of octenidine hydrochloride for reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes on cattle hides.

Authors:  Sangeetha Ananda Baskaran; Abhinav Upadhyay; Indu Upadhyaya; Varunkumar Bhattaram; Kumar Venkitanarayanan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Slaughter and Processing Interventions to Control Non-Typhoidal Salmonella in Beef and Pork.

Authors:  Ian Young; Barbara J Wilhelm; Sarah Cahill; Rei Nakagawa; Patricia Desmarchelier; Andrijana Rajić
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.077

3.  Salmonella contamination, serovars and antimicrobial resistance profiles of cattle slaughtered in South Africa.

Authors:  Evelyn Madoroba; Daniel Kapeta; Awoke K Gelaw
Journal:  Onderstepoort J Vet Res       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 1.792

4.  Effect of organic acids on Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus contaminated meat.

Authors:  M Raftari; F Azizi Jalilian; A S Abdulamir; R Son; Z Sekawi; A B Fatimah
Journal:  Open Microbiol J       Date:  2009-08-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.