| Literature DB >> 15034828 |
Philip C Hill1, Roger H Brookes, Annette Fox, Katherine Fielding, David J Jeffries, Dolly Jackson-Sillah, Moses D Lugos, Patrick K Owiafe, Simon A Donkor, Abdulrahman S Hammond, Jacob K Otu, Tumani Corrah, Richard A Adegbola, Keith P W J McAdam.
Abstract
The purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection lacks specificity. We assessed 2 more specific M. tuberculosis antigens (ESAT-6 and CFP-10) by enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT) compared with PPD by ELISPOT and skin test in The Gambia. Of 735 household contacts of 130 sputum smear-positive tuberculosis cases, 476 (65%) tested positive by PPD ELISPOT, 300 (41%) tested positive by PPD skin test, and 218 (30%) tested positive by ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT. Only 15 (2%) had positive ESAT-6/CFP-10 results and negative PPD results by ELISPOT. With increasing M. tuberculosis exposure, the percentage of subjects who were PPD skin test positive/ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT negative increased (P<.001), whereas the percentage of subjects who were PPD skin test negative/PPD ELISPOT positive decreased (P=.011). Eighteen (31%) ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT-positive subjects in the lowest exposure category had negative PPD skin test results. ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT probably offers increased specificity in the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection in this tropical setting of endemicity, at the cost of some sensitivity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15034828 DOI: 10.1086/382362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079