Literature DB >> 15032997

Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation.

Carrie A Joyce1, Irina F Gorodnitsky, Marta Kutas.   

Abstract

Signals from eye movements and blinks can be orders of magnitude larger than brain-generated electrical potentials and are one of the main sources of artifacts in electroencephalographic (EEG) data. Rejecting contaminated trials causes substantial data loss, and restricting eye movements/blinks limits the experimental designs possible and may impact the cognitive processes under investigation. This article presents a method based on blind source separation (BSS) for automatic removal of electroocular artifacts from EEG data. BBS is a signal-processing methodology that includes independent component analysis (ICA). In contrast to previously explored ICA-based methods for artifact removal, this method is automated. Moreover, the BSS algorithm described herein can isolate correlated electroocular components with a high degree of accuracy. Although the focus is on eliminating ocular artifacts in EEG data, the approach can be extended to other sources of EEG contamination such as cardiac signals, environmental noise, and electrode drift, and adapted for use with magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data, a magnetic correlate of EEG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15032997     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00141.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  66 in total

1.  Validating the truth of propositions: behavioral and ERP indicators of truth evaluation processes.

Authors:  Daniel Wiswede; Nicolas Koranyi; Florian Müller; Oliver Langner; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Removal of eye blinking artifact from the electro-encephalogram, incorporating a new constrained blind source separation algorithm.

Authors:  L Shoker; S Sanei; W Wang; J A Chambers
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  A graphical model for estimating stimulus-evoked brain responses from magnetoencephalography data with large background brain activity.

Authors:  Srikantan S Nagarajan; Hagai T Attias; Kenneth E Hild; Kensuke Sekihara
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Increased local and decreased remote functional connectivity at EEG alpha and beta frequency bands in opioid-dependent patients.

Authors:  Andrew A Fingelkurts; Alexander A Fingelkurts; Reetta Kivisaari; Taina Autti; Sergei Borisov; Varpu Puuskari; Olga Jokela; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  On the robust parametric detection of EEG artifacts in polysomnographic recordings.

Authors:  H Klekowicz; U Malinowska; A J Piotrowska; D Wołyńczyk-Gmaj; Sz Niemcewicz; P J Durka
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2009-03-24

6.  Evaluating the efficacy of fully automated approaches for the selection of eyeblink ICA components.

Authors:  Matthew B Pontifex; Vladimir Miskovic; Sarah Laszlo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  EEG artifacts reduction by multivariate empirical mode decomposition and multiscale entropy for monitoring depth of anaesthesia during surgery.

Authors:  Quan Liu; Yi-Feng Chen; Shou-Zen Fan; Maysam F Abbod; Jiann-Shing Shieh
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Electroencephalographic Evidence of Abnormal Anticipatory Uncertainty Processing in Gambling Disorder Patients.

Authors:  Alberto Megías; Juan F Navas; Ana Perandrés-Gómez; Antonio Maldonado; Andrés Catena; José C Perales
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-06

9.  Validation of ICA-based myogenic artifact correction for scalp and source-localized EEG.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Alexander J Shackman; Jeffrey S Maxwell; David R W Bachhuber; Adam M Koppenhaver; Lawrence L Greischar; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Different methods to define utility functions yield similar results but engage different neural processes.

Authors:  Marcus Heldmann; Bodo Vogt; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.