OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate interrater reliability and predictive validity of the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS), a clinician-rated 6-point Likert-type item measuring patient participation in inpatient rehabilitation sessions. DESIGN: Prospective measurement of patient participation in physical and occupational therapy sessions during inpatient rehabilitation. SETTING: University-based, freestanding acute rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-two inpatients, primarily elderly, with a variety of impairment diagnoses (eg, stroke), who were admitted for inpatient rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in the 13 motor items from the FIM trade mark instrument, from admission to discharge. RESULTS: The PRPS had high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.91 for occupational therapists; ICC=.96 for physical therapists). The subjects had mean PRPS scores +/- standard deviation of 4.73+/-0.76. Mean PRPS scores predicted rehabilitation outcome (N=242, r=.32, P<.0001), as measured by change in motor FIM. The strength of this association did not change in a multivariate model that controlled for age, gender, race, impairment group, medical comorbidity count, length of stay, and admission FIM. CONCLUSIONS: Patient participation during acute inpatient rehabilitation can be easily and reliably measured, and PRPS scores predict functional outcome. The PRPS may have applicability in clinical and research outcome measurement.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate interrater reliability and predictive validity of the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS), a clinician-rated 6-point Likert-type item measuring patient participation in inpatient rehabilitation sessions. DESIGN: Prospective measurement of patient participation in physical and occupational therapy sessions during inpatient rehabilitation. SETTING: University-based, freestanding acute rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-two inpatients, primarily elderly, with a variety of impairment diagnoses (eg, stroke), who were admitted for inpatient rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in the 13 motor items from the FIM trade mark instrument, from admission to discharge. RESULTS: The PRPS had high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.91 for occupational therapists; ICC=.96 for physical therapists). The subjects had mean PRPS scores +/- standard deviation of 4.73+/-0.76. Mean PRPS scores predicted rehabilitation outcome (N=242, r=.32, P<.0001), as measured by change in motor FIM. The strength of this association did not change in a multivariate model that controlled for age, gender, race, impairment group, medical comorbidity count, length of stay, and admission FIM. CONCLUSIONS:Patient participation during acute inpatient rehabilitation can be easily and reliably measured, and PRPS scores predict functional outcome. The PRPS may have applicability in clinical and research outcome measurement.
Authors: Elizabeth R Skidmore; Deirdre R Dawson; Ellen M Whyte; Meryl A Butters; Mary Amanda Dew; Emily S Grattan; James T Becker; Margo B Holm Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Eric J Lenze; Michael C Munin; Mary Amanda Dew; Robert S Marin; Meryl A Butters; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Ellen M Whyte; Amy Begley; Charles F Reynolds Journal: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.198
Authors: Laura Teeter; Julie Gassaway; Sally Taylor; Jacqueline LaBarbera; Shari McDowell; Deborah Backus; Jeanne M Zanca; Audrey Natale; Jordan Cabrera; Randall J Smout; Scott E D Kreider; Gale Whiteneck Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Joy Bailey; Marcel P Dijkers; Julie Gassaway; Jane Thomas; Patricia Lingefelt; Scott E D Kreider; Gale Whiteneck Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 1.985