Literature DB >> 15030641

What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance.

Jerry M Burger1, Nicole Messian, Shebani Patel, Alicia del Prado, Carmen Anderson.   

Abstract

Four studies examined the effect of an incidental similarity on compliance to a request. Undergraduates who believed they shared a birthday (Study 1), a first name (Study 2), or fingerprint similarities (Study 3) with a requester were more likely to comply with a request than participants who did not perceive an incidental similarity with the requester. The findings are consistent with past research demonstrating that people often rely on heuristic processing when responding to requests and with Heider's description of unit relationships in which perceived similarities lead to positive affect. Consistent with the unit relation interpretation, participants did not increase compliance when hearing about an incidental similarity with someone other than the requester or when they believed the feature they shared with the requester was common.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15030641     DOI: 10.1177/0146167203258838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  14 in total

1.  Evolution of cooperation by phenotypic similarity.

Authors:  Tibor Antal; Hisashi Ohtsuki; John Wakeley; Peter D Taylor; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Diversity of opinions promotes herding in uncertain crowds.

Authors:  Joaquin Navajas; Oriane Armand; Rani Moran; Bahador Bahrami; Ophelia Deroy
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  The Use of Intergroup Social Comparison in Promoting Water Conservation: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in China.

Authors:  Yijie Wang; Lei Xie; Shuang Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  We're warmer (they're more competent): I-sharing and African Americans' perceptions of the ingroup and outgroup.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Pinel; Anson E Long; Leslie A Crimin
Journal:  Eur J Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-11-11

5.  Dynamic remodeling of in-group bias during the 2008 presidential election.

Authors:  David G Rand; Thomas Pfeiffer; Anna Dreber; Rachel W Sheketoff; Nils C Wernerfelt; Yochai Benkler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Integrating social networks and human social motives to achieve social influence at scale.

Authors:  Noshir S Contractor; Leslie A DeChurch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Playing with Strangers: Which Shared Traits Attract Us Most to New People?

Authors:  Jacques Launay; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does implied community size predict likeability of a similar stranger?

Authors:  Jacques Launay; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.178

9.  The name-letter-effect in groups: sharing initials with group members increases the quality of group work.

Authors:  Evan Polman; Monique M H Pollmann; T Andrew Poehlman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hot Speech and Exploding Bombs: Autonomic Arousal During Emotion Classification of Prosodic Utterances and Affective Sounds.

Authors:  Rebecca Jürgens; Julia Fischer; Annekathrin Schacht
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.