Literature DB >> 15029791

Strategy as ecology.

Marco Iansiti1, Roy Levien.   

Abstract

Microsoft's and Wal-Mart's preeminence in modern business has been attributed to any number of factors--from the vision and drive of their founders to the companies' aggressive competitive practices. But the authors maintain that the success realized by these two very different companies is due only partly to the organizations themselves; a bigger factor is the success of the networks of companies with which Microsoft and Wal-Mart do business. Most companies today inhabit ecosystems--loose networks of suppliers, distributors, and outsourcers; makers of related products or services; providers of relevant technology; and other organizations that affect, and are affected by, the creation and delivery of a company's own offering. Despite being increasingly central to modern business, ecosystems are still poorly understood and even more poorly managed. The analogy between business networks and biological ecosystems can aid this understanding by vividly highlighting certain pivotal concepts. The moves that a company makes will, to varying degrees, affect the health of its business network, which in turn will ultimately affect the organization's performance--for ill as well as for good. Because a company, like an individual species in a biological ecosystem, ultimately shares its fate with the network as a whole, smart firms pursue strategies that will benefit everyone. So how can you promote the health and the stability of your own ecosystem, determine your place in it, and develop a strategy to match your role, thereby helping to ensure your company's well-being? It depends on your role--current and potential--within the network. Is your company a niche player, a keystone, or a dominator? The answer to this question may be different for different parts of your business. It may also change as your ecosystem changes. Knowing what to do requires understanding the ecosystem and your organization's role in it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15029791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harv Bus Rev        ISSN: 0017-8012


  7 in total

1.  Informatics technology mimics ecology: dense, mutualistic collaboration networks are associated with higher publication rates.

Authors:  Marco D Sorani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A framework for the delivery of public health: an ecological approach.

Authors:  Jo Nurse; Paul Edmondson-Jones
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Quantifying the web browser ecosystem.

Authors:  Sela Ferdman; Einat Minkov; Ron Bekkerman; David Gefen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sustainable development of cognitive science and technology ecosystem; an overview to the "human brain project" as a functioning sample.

Authors:  Hossein Farrokhi; Iman Ghodrati Toostani; Maghsoud Farasatkhah; Hamed Ekhtiari
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014

5.  FinTech: A New Hedge for a Financial Re-intermediation. Strategy and Risk Perspectives.

Authors:  Anna Omarini
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2020-10-15

Review 6.  Blockchain in Health Care Innovation: Literature Review and Case Study From a Business Ecosystem Perspective.

Authors:  Shuchih Ernest Chang; YiChian Chen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Keystone actors do not act alone: A business ecosystem perspective on sustainability in the global clothing industry.

Authors:  Jacob Hileman; Ivan Kallstenius; Tiina Häyhä; Celinda Palm; Sarah Cornell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.