Literature DB >> 15028213

Neural correlates of saccadic suppression in humans.

Raimund Kleiser1, Rüdiger J Seitz, Bart Krekelberg.   

Abstract

When you look into a mirror and move your eyes left to right, you will see that you cannot observe your own eye movements. This demonstrates the phenomenon of saccadic suppression: during saccadic eye movements, visual sensitivity is much reduced. Given that humans make more than 100,000 eye movements each day, it is clear why suppression is needed: without it, the motion on the retina would prevent us from seeing anything at all. Psychophysical data show that suppression is stimulus selective: it is strongest for the kind of stimuli that preferentially activate magnocellular thalamic neurons. This has led to the hypothesis that saccadic suppression selectively targets the magnocellular stream. We used fMRI to find brain areas with a stimulus-selective suppression of the BOLD signal that matches the psychophysical data. We found such a neural correlate of saccadic suppression in the dorsal stream (hMT+, V7) and in ventral area V4. These areas receive magnocellular input; hence our findings are consistent with the magnocellular hypothesis. The range of effects in our data and in single cell data, however, argues against a single thalamic mechanism that suppresses all cortical input. Instead, we speculate that saccadic suppression relies on multiple mechanisms operating in different cortical areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15028213     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  36 in total

1.  Covert orienting of attention and overt eye movements activate identical brain regions.

Authors:  Bianca de Haan; Paul S Morgan; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Intrasaccadic suppression is dominated by reduced detector gain.

Authors:  Jon Guez; Adam P Morris; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control.

Authors:  Anika Maraj; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Spatiotopic coding and remapping in humans.

Authors:  David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Apparent motion during saccadic suppression periods.

Authors:  Robert Scott Allison; Jens Schumacher; Shabnam Sadr; Rainer Herpers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A neural locus for spatial-frequency specific saccadic suppression in visual-motor neurons of the primate superior colliculus.

Authors:  Chih-Yang Chen; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Practice improves peri-saccadic shape judgment but does not diminish target mislocalization.

Authors:  Yuval Porat; Ehud Zohary
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Central fixations with rightward deviations: saccadic eye movements on the landmark task.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cortical contributions to saccadic suppression.

Authors:  George Chahine; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.