Literature DB >> 15026928

Disruptive visions: surgical education.

R M Satava1.   

Abstract

Technological change, decreased financial support for medical education, and social oversight (in the form of the "To Err Is Human" report, HIPPA, and reduced work hours) are forcing a rethinking of the traditional model of surgical education to improve patient safety. New approaches to evaluating surgical competence, such as objective assessment, in combination with new technologies, such as the Internet and surgical simulators, provide the tools to effect a revolution in surgical education and training. Competency based upon quantifiable criteria measures must replace the traditional subjective assessment. The implementation requires accurately defining the elements of training, establishing new quantifiable metrics, stringently measuring performance against criterion, and reporting outcomes throughout the career of a surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15026928     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8224-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents.

Authors:  J A Martin; G Regehr; R Reznick; H MacRae; J Murnaghan; C Hutchison; M Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination.

Authors:  R Reznick; G Regehr; H MacRae; J Martin; W McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  A new approach to a final examination in surgery. Use of the objective structured clinical examination.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; F A Gleeson; R M Harden; R A Wood
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 1.891

  4 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Design and development of a surgical skills simulation curriculum.

Authors:  David A McClusky; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Viewer discretion advised: is YouTube a friend or foe in surgical education?

Authors:  H Alejandro Rodriguez; Monica T Young; Hope T Jackson; Brant K Oelschlager; Andrew S Wright
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: An approach to enhance the surgical team performance.

Authors:  Kinga A Powers; Scott T Rehrig; Noel Irias; Hedwig A Albano; Andrew Malinow; Stephanie B Jones; Donald W Moorman; John B Pawlowski; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Malpractice carrier underwrites Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety.

Authors:  Alexandre Y Derevianko; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Shawn Tsuda; Limaris Barrios; David C Brooks; Mark P Callery; David Fobert; Noel Irias; David W Rattner; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Concerns of quality, utility, and reliability of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in public video sharing platform.

Authors:  Shun Zhang; Tetsu Fukunaga; Shinichi Oka; Hajime Orita; Sanae Kaji; Yukinori Yube; Suguru Yamauchi; Yoshinori Kohira; Hiroyuki Egawa
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.