OBJECTIVE: To obtain knowledge about the conditions and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a collaborative network of Brain Information Technology centres. DESIGN: The Brain IT (Brain monitoring with Information Technology) survey comprised two parts: local conditions and policies (part A), and a case study part (part B). The information was gathered by written questionnaires followed by telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four Brain IT centres participated (two respondents from 18 sites). RESULTS: The average proportion of agreement between duplicate respondents was 0.79 (range 0.44-1.00). All Brain IT centres monitored ICP. The reported order of treatment for intracranial hypertension was: evacuation of mass-lesions and head elevation (1), increase of sedation and Mannitol scheme (2), hyperventilation (3), ventricular drainage (4), craniectomy and pentothal coma (5), and decompressive lobectomy (6). The respondents were less prone to evacuate expansive contusions in relation to extra cerebral hematomas. The most common suggested interventions (alone or in combination) for treatment of intracranial hypertension without mass lesions was the Mannitol scheme (included in 71% of the suggestions), CSF drainage (included in 56%), hyperventilation (included in 32%), and pentothal coma (included in 22%). CONCLUSIONS: The suggested management of TBI was mainly in accordance with published guidelines, although a minor proportion of the answers deviated to some extent. The suggested order and combinations of different treatment interventions varied. Variation of treatment within the range of prescribed standards provides optimal conditions for an interesting future analysis of treatment and monitoring data as collected prospectively in a Brain IT database.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain knowledge about the conditions and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a collaborative network of Brain Information Technology centres. DESIGN: The Brain IT (Brain monitoring with Information Technology) survey comprised two parts: local conditions and policies (part A), and a case study part (part B). The information was gathered by written questionnaires followed by telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four Brain IT centres participated (two respondents from 18 sites). RESULTS: The average proportion of agreement between duplicate respondents was 0.79 (range 0.44-1.00). All Brain IT centres monitored ICP. The reported order of treatment for intracranial hypertension was: evacuation of mass-lesions and head elevation (1), increase of sedation and Mannitol scheme (2), hyperventilation (3), ventricular drainage (4), craniectomy and pentothalcoma (5), and decompressive lobectomy (6). The respondents were less prone to evacuate expansive contusions in relation to extra cerebral hematomas. The most common suggested interventions (alone or in combination) for treatment of intracranial hypertension without mass lesions was the Mannitol scheme (included in 71% of the suggestions), CSF drainage (included in 56%), hyperventilation (included in 32%), and pentothalcoma (included in 22%). CONCLUSIONS: The suggested management of TBI was mainly in accordance with published guidelines, although a minor proportion of the answers deviated to some extent. The suggested order and combinations of different treatment interventions varied. Variation of treatment within the range of prescribed standards provides optimal conditions for an interesting future analysis of treatment and monitoring data as collected prospectively in a Brain IT database.
Authors: I Piper; G Citerio; I Chambers; C Contant; P Enblad; H Fiddes; T Howells; K Kiening; P Nilsson; Y H Yau Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: A I Maas; M Dearden; G M Teasdale; R Braakman; F Cohadon; F Iannotti; A Karimi; F Lapierre; G Murray; J Ohman; L Persson; F Servadei; N Stocchetti; A Unterberg Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 1997 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: G D Murray; G M Teasdale; R Braakman; F Cohadon; M Dearden; F Iannotti; A Karimi; F Lapierre; A Maas; J Ohman; L Persson; F Servadei; N Stocchetti; T Trojanowski; A Unterberg Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 1999 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: N Stocchetti; K I Penny; M Dearden; R Braakman; F Cohadon; F Iannotti; F Lapierre; A Karimi; A Maas; G D Murray; J Ohman; L Persson; F Servadei; G M Teasdale; T Trojanowski; A Unterberg Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-01-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Fabian Güiza; Bart Depreitere; Ian Piper; Giuseppe Citerio; Iain Chambers; Patricia A Jones; Tsz-Yan Milly Lo; Per Enblad; Pelle Nillson; Bart Feyen; Philippe Jorens; Andrew Maas; Martin U Schuhmann; Rob Donald; Laura Moss; Greet Van den Berghe; Geert Meyfroidt Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale; Martin Griebenow; Stefan-Nikolaus Kroppenstedt; Andreas W Unterberg; John F Stover Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-10-26 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jörg Martin; Anja Heymann; Katrin Bäsell; Ralf Baron; Rolf Biniek; Hartmut Bürkle; Peter Dall; Christine Dictus; Verena Eggers; Ingolf Eichler; Lothar Engelmann; Lars Garten; Wolfgang Hartl; Ulrike Haase; Ralf Huth; Paul Kessler; Stefan Kleinschmidt; Wolfgang Koppert; Franz-Josef Kretz; Heinz Laubenthal; Guenter Marggraf; Andreas Meiser; Edmund Neugebauer; Ulrike Neuhaus; Christian Putensen; Michael Quintel; Alexander Reske; Bernard Roth; Jens Scholz; Stefan Schröder; Dierk Schreiter; Jürgen Schüttler; Gerhard Schwarzmann; Robert Stingele; Peter Tonner; Philip Tränkle; Rolf Detlef Treede; Tomislav Trupkovic; Michael Tryba; Frank Wappler; Christian Waydhas; Claudia Spies Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2010-02-02
Authors: Maryse C Cnossen; Jilske A Huijben; Mathieu van der Jagt; Victor Volovici; Thomas van Essen; Suzanne Polinder; David Nelson; Ari Ercole; Nino Stocchetti; Giuseppe Citerio; Wilco C Peul; Andrew I R Maas; David Menon; Ewout W Steyerberg; Hester F Lingsma Journal: Crit Care Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Maryse C Cnossen; Suzanne Polinder; Hester F Lingsma; Andrew I R Maas; David Menon; Ewout W Steyerberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 3.240