OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effect of operator experience on the treatment outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for malignant liver tumors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: RFA is gaining popularity as the ablative therapy of choice for liver tumors. It is generally considered a simple and safe technique, and little attention has been paid to the importance of operator experience in this treatment. A learning curve in this treatment modality has not been documented before. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical data and treatment outcomes of the initial 100 patients undergoing RFA for liver tumors (hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 84; metastasis, n = 15; cholangiocarcinoma n = 1) were collected prospectively. All patients were managed by a single team of surgeons and interventional radiologists. The data of the first 50 patients (group I) and the second 50 patients (group II) were compared. RESULTS: RFA was performed by percutaneous (group I, n = 22; group II, n = 19), open (group I, n = 26; group II, n = 30) or laparoscopic (group I, n = 2; group II, n = 1) approach. In group I, 30 patients (60%) had a solitary tumor and 20 (40%) had multiple tumors; in group II, 35 patients (70%) had a solitary tumor and 15 (30%) had multiple tumors (P = 0.295). The size of the largest tumor was comparable between groups I and II (median, 2.8 cm in both groups; P = 0.508). Group II had significantly shorter hospital stay (median, 4.0 versus 5.5 days; P = 0.048), lower morbidity rate (4% versus 16%; P = 0.046) and higher complete ablation rate (100% versus 85.7%; P = 0.006) than group I. There was 1 hospital death (2%) in group I and 0 in group II. By multivariate analysis, treatment period (group I versus group II) was an independent significant factor affecting the morbidity rate and complete ablation rate. CONCLUSIONS: A low complication rate and a high complete ablation rate could be achieved with the accumulated experience from the first 50 cases of RFA for liver tumors by a specialized team. This study demonstrates that there is a significant learning curve in RFA for liver tumors.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effect of operator experience on the treatment outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for malignant liver tumors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: RFA is gaining popularity as the ablative therapy of choice for liver tumors. It is generally considered a simple and safe technique, and little attention has been paid to the importance of operator experience in this treatment. A learning curve in this treatment modality has not been documented before. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical data and treatment outcomes of the initial 100 patients undergoing RFA for liver tumors (hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 84; metastasis, n = 15; cholangiocarcinoma n = 1) were collected prospectively. All patients were managed by a single team of surgeons and interventional radiologists. The data of the first 50 patients (group I) and the second 50 patients (group II) were compared. RESULTS: RFA was performed by percutaneous (group I, n = 22; group II, n = 19), open (group I, n = 26; group II, n = 30) or laparoscopic (group I, n = 2; group II, n = 1) approach. In group I, 30 patients (60%) had a solitary tumor and 20 (40%) had multiple tumors; in group II, 35 patients (70%) had a solitary tumor and 15 (30%) had multiple tumors (P = 0.295). The size of the largest tumor was comparable between groups I and II (median, 2.8 cm in both groups; P = 0.508). Group II had significantly shorter hospital stay (median, 4.0 versus 5.5 days; P = 0.048), lower morbidity rate (4% versus 16%; P = 0.046) and higher complete ablation rate (100% versus 85.7%; P = 0.006) than group I. There was 1 hospital death (2%) in group I and 0 in group II. By multivariate analysis, treatment period (group I versus group II) was an independent significant factor affecting the morbidity rate and complete ablation rate. CONCLUSIONS: A low complication rate and a high complete ablation rate could be achieved with the accumulated experience from the first 50 cases of RFA for liver tumors by a specialized team. This study demonstrates that there is a significant learning curve in RFA for liver tumors.
Authors: J Machi; S Uchida; K Sumida; W M Limm; S A Hundahl; A J Oishi; N L Furumoto; R H Oishi Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2001 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: J H Peters; E C Ellison; J T Innes; J L Liss; K E Nichols; J M Lomano; S R Roby; M E Front; L C Carey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1991-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: D A Danford; J D Kugler; B Deal; C Case; R A Friedman; J P Saul; M J Silka; G F Van Hare Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1995-03-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Karen T Brown; Stephen B Solomon; Anne M Covey; William Alago; Lynn A Brody; Raymond H Thornton; Michael D'Angelica; Yuman Fong; Nancy E Kemeny Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Michael Z Su; Fatima Memon; Howard M Lau; Andrew J Brooks; Manish I Patel; Henry H Woo; Simon V Bariol; Philip Vladica Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: John Wong; Kit-Fai Lee; Simon Chun-Ho Yu; Paul Sing-Fun Lee; Yue-Sun Cheung; Ching-Ning Chong; Philip Ching-Tak Ip; Paul Bo-San Lai Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 3.647