Literature DB >> 15024302

Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study.

Juan A Luján1, M Dolores Frutos, Quiteria Hernández, Ramón Liron, Jose R Cuenca, Graciela Valero, Pascual Parrilla.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the results of open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Gastric bypass is one of the most commonly acknowledged surgical techniques for the management of morbid obesity. It is usually performed as an open surgery procedure, although now some groups perform it via the laparoscopic approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1999 and January 2002 we conducted a randomized prospective study in 104 patients diagnosed with morbid obesity. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 1 group with gastric bypass via the open approach (OGBP) comprising 51 patients, and 1 group with gastric bypass via the laparoscopic approach (LGBP) comprising 53 patients. The parameters compared were as follows: operating time, intraoperative complications, early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) postoperative complications, hospital stay, and short-term evolution of body mass index.
RESULTS: Mean operating time was 186.4 minutes (125-290) in the LGBP group and 201.7 minutes (129-310) in the OGBP group (P < 0.05). Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 8% of the LGBP patients. Early postoperative complications (<30 days) occurred in 22.6% of the LGBP group compared with 29.4% of the OGBP group, with no significant differences. Late complications (>30 days) occurred in 11% of the LGBP group compared with 24% of the OGBP group (P < 0.05). The differences observed between the 2 groups are the result of a high incidence of abdominal wall hernias in the OGBP group. Mean hospital stay was 5.2 days (1-13) in the LGBP group and 7.9 days (2-28) in the OGBP group (P < 0.05). Evolution of body mass index during a mean follow-up of 23 months was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: LGBP is a good surgical technique for the management of morbid obesity and has clear advantages over OGBP, such as a reduction in abdominal wall complications and a shorter hospital stay. The midterm weight loss is similar with both techniques. One inconvenience is that LGBP has a more complex learning curve than other advanced laparoscopic techniques, which may be associated with an increase in postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15024302      PMCID: PMC1356246          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000120071.75691.1f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  21 in total

Review 1.  Gastric bypass for treating severe obesity.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; J M Kellum; K M Engle; L Wolfe; J V Starkey; R Birkenhauer; P Fletcher; M J Sawyer
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.

Authors:  P R Schauer; S Ikramuddin; W Gourash; R Ramanathan; J Luketich
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Gastric bypass operation for obesity.

Authors:  M A Fobi; H Lee; R Holness; D Cabinda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Leaks occurring after gastric bariatric operations.

Authors:  J A Buckwalter; C A Herbst
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Results and complications of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: an early and intermediate experience.

Authors:  S Abu-Abeid; A Szold
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Peptic ulcer/stricture after gastric bypass: a comparison of technique and acid suppression variables.

Authors:  G Darby Pope; Philip P Goodney; Kenneth W Burchard; Richard R Proia; Andri Olafsson; Brian E Lacy; Lara J Burrows
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Retrospective analysis of laparoscopic gastric banding technique: short-term and mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  F Berrevoet; P Pattyn; A Cardon; F de Ryck; U J Hesse; B de Hemptinne
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Late results of gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity.

Authors:  R B Reinhold
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A randomized prospective trial of gastric bypass versus vertical banded gastroplasty for morbid obesity and their effects on sweets versus non-sweets eaters.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; J V Starkey; R Birkenhauer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Stomal complications of gastric bypass: incidence and outcome of therapy.

Authors:  A J Sanyal; H J Sugerman; J M Kellum; K M Engle; L Wolfe
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  73 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Sheldon Randall; Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; William M Abbott; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Roux limb volvulus in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to Roux limb stabilization suture: case series.

Authors:  Brendan Marr; Panduranga Yenumula
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Utility of routine versus selective upper gastrointestinal series to detect anastomotic leaks after laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Marc Schiesser; Josef Guber; Stefan Wildi; Ivo Guber; Markus Weber; Markus K Muller
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Antecolic or Retrocolic Alimentary Limb in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fabio Rondelli; Walter Bugiantella; Matteo Desio; Maria Cristina Vedovati; Marcello Boni; Nicola Avenia; Adriano Guerra
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Use of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M S Sajid; K Khatri; K Singh; M Sayegh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  M R Ali; B Bhaskerrao; B M Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Polypropylene mesh in prevention of postoperative hernia in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Janusz Strzelczyk; Leszek Czupryniak
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Obesity in the United States: is there a quick fix? Pros and cons of bariatric surgery from the pediatric perspective.

Authors:  Mark L Wulkan; Megan M Durham
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-12

10.  Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass.

Authors:  Nancy Puzziferri; Iselin T Austrheim-Smith; Bruce M Wolfe; Samuel E Wilson; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.