Literature DB >> 1502326

LET, track structure and models. A review.

G Kraft1, M Krämer, M Scholz.   

Abstract

Swift heavy ions when penetrating through matter strip off those electrons having a smaller orbital velocity than the ion velocity. The remaining electrons screen the nuclear charge yielding an effective charge. The effective charge of the ions interacts predominantly with the target electrons causing excitation and ionizations of the target atoms. Using the Bethe Bloch formula for the energy loss combined with the Barkas formula for effective charge, the energy loss values as well as unrestricted and restricted linear transfer can be calculated within a few percent of accuracy. From the primary energy loss only a small fraction of 10% or less is transformed into excitation. The major part of the energy loss is used for the ionization of the target atoms and the emission of the corresponding electrons with a high kinetic energy. These electrons form the track around the trajectory of the primary ion in which two thirds of the primary energy is deposited by collisions of primary, secondary and later generations of electrons with the target molecules. In the electron diffusion process the energy is transported from the center of the track into the halo. The radial dose decreases with the square of the radial distance from the center. The diameter of the track is determined by the maximum range of the emitted electrons, i.e. by the maximum energy electrons. All ions having the same velocity i.e. the same specific energy produce electrons of the same energy and therefore tracks of the same diameters independent of the effective charge. But the dose inside the track increases with the square of the effective charge. Track structure models using this continuous dose distributions produce a better agreement with the experiment than models based on microdosimetry. The critical volume as used in microdosimetry is too large compared to the size of the DNA as critical structure inside the biological objects. Track structure models yield better results because the gross-structure of the track i.e. its lateral extension and the thin down toward the end of the track is included in these calculations. In a recent refinement the repair capacity of the cell has been included in a track structure model by using the complete shouldered x-ray survival curve as a template for the local damage produced by the particle tracks. This improved model yields presently the best agreement with the experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1502326     DOI: 10.1007/bf01214825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  6 in total

1.  Delta-electron emission in fast heavy ion atom collisions.

Authors:  H Schmidt-Böcking; U Ramm; G Kraft; J Ullrich; H Berg; C Kelbch; R E Olson; R DuBois; S Hagmann; F Jiazhen
Journal:  Adv Space Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.152

2.  Coulomb explosions in a metallic glass due to the passage of fast heavy ions?

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1986-08-18       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Microdosimetry near the trajectory of high-energy heavy ions.

Authors:  N F Metting; H H Rossi; L A Braby; P J Kliauga; J Howard; M Zaider; W Schimmerling; M Wong; M Rapkin
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  A model of ion track structure based on classical collision dynamics.

Authors:  J Kiefer; H Straaten
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Inactivation of cells by heavy ion bombardment.

Authors:  R Katz; B Ackerson; M Homayoonfar; S C Sharma
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Theory of RBE for heavy ion bombardment of dry enzymes and viruses.

Authors:  J J Butts; R Katz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 2.841

  6 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Heavy ion effects on cells: chromosomal aberrations, mutations and neoplastic transformations.

Authors:  J Kiefer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Damage to cellular DNA from particulate radiations, the efficacy of its processing and the radiosensitivity of mammalian cells. Emphasis on DNA double strand breaks and chromatin breaks.

Authors:  J T Lett
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Cell inactivation by heavy charged particles.

Authors:  E A Blakely
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Mechanisms of induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks by ionizing radiation: some contradictions.

Authors:  U Hagen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Molecular and cell models of biological effects of heavy ion radiation.

Authors:  D T Goodhead
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Rearrangements of the DNA in carbon ion-induced mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  N Shikazono; A Tanaka; H Watanabe; S Tano
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Mutation rate and novel tt mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana induced by carbon ions.

Authors:  Naoya Shikazono; Yukihiko Yokota; Satoshi Kitamura; Chihiro Suzuki; Hiroshi Watanabe; Shigemitsu Tano; Atsushi Tanaka
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Effects of Charged Particles on Human Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Kathryn D Held; Hidemasa Kawamura; Takuya Kaminuma; Athena Evalour S Paz; Yukari Yoshida; Qi Liu; Henning Willers; Akihisa Takahashi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  A generalized target theory and its applications.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Dong Mi; Bei Hu; Yeqing Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Dependence and independence of survival parameters on linear energy transfer in cells and tissues.

Authors:  Koichi Ando; Dudley T Goodhead
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.