Literature DB >> 1438677

Damage to cellular DNA from particulate radiations, the efficacy of its processing and the radiosensitivity of mammalian cells. Emphasis on DNA double strand breaks and chromatin breaks.

J T Lett1.   

Abstract

For several years, it has been evident that cellular radiation biology is in a necessary period of consolidation and transition (Lett 1987, 1990; Lett et al. 1986, 1987). Both changes are moving apace, and have been stimulated by studies with heavy charged particles. From the standpoint of radiation chemistry, there is now a consensus of opinion that the DNA hydration shell must be distinguished from bulk water in the cell nucleus and treated as an integral part of DNA (chromatin) (Lett 1987). Concomitantly, sentiment is strengthening for the abandonment of the classical notions of "direct" and "indirect" action (Fielden and O'Neill 1991; O'Neill 1991; O'Neill et al. 1991; Schulte-Frohlinde and Bothe 1991 and references therein). A layer of water molecules outside, or in the outer edge of, the DNA (chromatin) hydration shell influences cellular radiosensitivity in ways not fully understood. Charge and energy transfer processes facilitated by, or involving, DNA hydration must be considered in rigorous theories of radiation action on cells. The induction and processing of double stand breaks (DSBs) in DNA (chromatin) seem to be the predominant determinants of the radiotoxicity of normally radioresistant mammalian cells, the survival curves of which reflect the patterns of damage induced and the damage present after processing ceases, and can be modelled in formal terms by the use of reaction (enzyme) kinetics. Incongruities such as sublethal damage are neither scientifically sound nor relevant to cellular radiation biology (Calkins 1991; Lett 1990; Lett et al. 1987a). Increases in linear energy transfer (LET infinity) up to 100-200 keV micron-1 cause increases in the extents of neighboring chemical and physical damage in DNA denoted by the general term DSB. Those changes are accompanied by decreasing abilities of cells normally radioresistant to sparsely ionizing radiations to process DSBs in DNA and chromatin and to recover from radiation exposure, so they make significant contributions to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of a given radiation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Radiation Health; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1438677     DOI: 10.1007/bf01210207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  28 in total

1.  Crosslinking and degradation of deoxyribonucleic acid gels with varying water contents when irradiated with electrons.

Authors:  J T LETT; P ALEXANDER
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Damage to DNA and chromatin structure from ionizing radiations, and the radiation sensitivities of mammalian cells.

Authors:  J T Lett
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  1990

Review 3.  Molecular radiation biology: future aspects.

Authors:  U Hagen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Different oxygen enhancement ratios for induced and unrejoined DNA double-strand breaks in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  M Frankenberg-Schwager; D Frankenberg; R Harbich
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Analysis of interphase chromosome damage by means of premature chromosome condensation after X- and ultraviolet-irradiation.

Authors:  C A Waldren; R T Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The production of strand breaks in mammalian DNA by X-rays: at different stages in the cell cycle.

Authors:  J T Lett; C Sun
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  The radiation responses of synchronous L5178Y S/S cells and their significance for radiobiological theory.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; A B Cox; J T Lett
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-12-31

8.  Radiolytic pathways in gamma-irradiated DNA: influence of chemical and conformational factors.

Authors:  S Gregoli; M Olast; A Bertinchamps
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  A comparative study of rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in yeast irradiated with 3.5 MeV alpha-particles or with 30 MeV electrons.

Authors:  M Frankenberg-Schwager; D Frankenberg; R Harbich; C Adamczyk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Fast kinetics of the oxygen effect for DNA double-strand breakage and cell killing in irradiated yeast.

Authors:  D Frankenberg; B D Michael; M Frankenberg-Schwager; R Harbich
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.694

View more
  14 in total

1.  The effect of packing and conformation on free radical yields in films of variably hydrated DNA.

Authors:  M T Milano; W A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Cardiovascular diseases in survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Neha Bansal; Javier G Blanco; Umesh C Sharma; Saraswati Pokharel; Shannon Shisler; Steven E Lipshultz
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 3.  Effects of heavy ions on nucleic acids: measurement of the damage.

Authors:  J Cadet; I Girault; M Gromova; D Molko; F Odin; M Polverelli
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Effects of alpha-particles on survival and chromosomal aberrations in human mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  M Durante; G F Grossi; G Gialanella; M Pugliese; M Nappo; T C Yang
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 5.  Mechanisms of induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks by ionizing radiation: some contradictions.

Authors:  U Hagen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Micronucleus induction and reproductive death in a human cell line exposed to low-energy argon beam.

Authors:  A Courdi; D Mari; J Hérault; P Chauvel
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Strategy and tactics in radiobiological research. Comments on a recent article by J.T. Lett.

Authors:  H H Rossi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Relative biological effectiveness of 12C and 28Si radiation in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Shubhankar Suman; Kamal Datta; Daniela Trani; Evagelia C Laiakis; Steven J Strawn; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 9.  DNA studies using atomic force microscopy: capabilities for measurement of short DNA fragments.

Authors:  Dalong Pang; Alain R Thierry; Anatoly Dritschilo
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2015-01-29

Review 10.  Big Data Analytics for Prostate Radiotherapy.

Authors:  James Coates; Luis Souhami; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.