Literature DB >> 15023223

Cancer and cancer risk in South Australia: what evidence for a rural-urban health differential?

David Wilkinson1, Kate Cameron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of evidence for a rural-urban health differential in cancer and cancer risk in South Australia.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis and synthesis of data available between 1977 and 2000 from the publications of the South Australian Cancer Registry and reports of population health surveys carried out by the South Australian Department of Human Services.
RESULTS: The mean annual age-standardised incidence of all forms of cancer combined was about 4% lower for rural residents (265.2 per 100,000 cf. 274.9 per 100,000). Of 31 types of cancer listed, the incidence of three was significantly higher among rural residents, the incidence of eight was significantly higher among urban residents and for 20 types there was no significant difference. Five year case survival for all cancers combined was 52% in both urban and rural residents. Significant survival differences were identified for only 10 cancers and survival for each was higher among urban residents. Melanomas were diagnosed in situ more often in the country, but invasive cases tended to be thicker. There was no rural-urban difference in early detection rates for breast cancer or bladder cancer. There were no substantial reported differences in major risk factors and early detection experiences apart from higher rates of smoking in the country.
CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence for substantial or systematic differences in risk factors for, and incidence and early detection of cancers between urban and rural South Australia. However, the apparent consistently poorer survival among rural residents warrants further study. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: It is widely reported that the health status of rural Australians is worse than that of their urban counterparts. There is an apparent increasing gradient in mortality from urban to remote areas of Australia. However, this apparent gradient is not evident for all diseases. This paper seeks to answer the question: is there any difference in the cancer disease experience (incidence, survival and early detection) and cancer risk factors between residents of rural and urban South Australia. Cancer registry data indicate that overall, the incidence of cancer is similar in rural and urban South Australia. The findings on survival differentials are of concern. While overall survival rates are very similar in country and city, and this is encouraging, analysis of individual types of cancer raises some concerns. The registry reports that significant differences in survival were only measured for 10 cancers and for all of these rural residents experienced higher mortality rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15023223     DOI: 10.1111/j.1038-5282.2004.00555.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Rural Health        ISSN: 1038-5282            Impact factor:   1.662


  14 in total

1.  An exploration of urban and rural differences in lung cancer survival among medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Lisa R Shugarman; Melony E S Sorbero; Haijun Tian; Arvind K Jain; J Scott Ashwood
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Life in urban areas and breast cancer risk in the French E3N cohort.

Authors:  Blandine Binachon; Laure Dossus; Aurélie M N Danjou; Francoise Clavel-Chapelon; Beatrice Fervers
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Developing the atlas of cancer in Queensland: methodological issues.

Authors:  Susanna M Cramb; Kerrie L Mengersen; Peter D Baade
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.918

4.  Rural - urban inequalities in late-stage breast cancer: spatial and social dimensions of risk and access.

Authors:  Sara McLafferty; Fahui Wang; Lan Luo; Jared Butler
Journal:  Environ Plann B Plann Des       Date:  2011-08

5.  Risk of several cancers is higher in urban areas after adjusting for socioeconomic status. Results from a two-country population-based study of 18 common cancers.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; David Donnelly; Avril Hegarty; Anne-Elie Carsin; Sandra Deady; Neil McCluskey; Anna Gavin; Harry Comber
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  A multilevel study of the determinants of area-level inequalities in colorectal cancer survival.

Authors:  Peter D Baade; Gavin Turrell; Joanne F Aitken
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Cancer Screening among immigrants living in urban and regional Australia: results from the 45 and up study.

Authors:  Marianne F Weber; May Chiew; Eleonora Feletto; Clare Kahn; Freddy Sitas; Lucy Webster
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Urban Rural Differences in Breast Cancer in New Zealand.

Authors:  Ross Lawrenson; Chunhuan Lao; Mark Elwood; Charis Brown; Diana Sarfati; Ian Campbell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia.

Authors:  Michael J Ireland; Sonja March; Fiona Crawford-Williams; Mandy Cassimatis; Joanne F Aitken; Melissa K Hyde; Suzanne K Chambers; Jiandong Sun; Jeff Dunn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Factors influencing the speed of cancer diagnosis in rural Western Australia: a General Practice perspective.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa; Georgia Halkett; Samar Aoun; Hayley Arnet; Marthe Smith; Megan Pilkington; Cheryl McMullen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.