Literature DB >> 15023221

Work of female rural doctors.

Jo Wainer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the impact of family life on the ways women practice rural medicine and the changes needed to attract women to rural practice.
DESIGN: Census of women rural doctors in Victoria in 2000, using a self-completed postal survey.
SETTING: General and specialist practice.
SUBJECTS: Two hundred and seventy-one female general practitioners and 31 female specialists practising in Rural, Remote and Metropolitan Area Classifications 3-7. General practitioners are those doctors with a primary medical degree and without additional specialist qualifications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Interaction of hours and type of work with family responsibilities.
RESULTS: Generalist and specialist women rural doctors carry the main responsibility for family care. This is reflected in the number of hours they work in clinical and non-clinical professional practice, availability for on-call and hospital work, and preference for the responsibilities of practice partnership or the flexibility of salaried positions. Most of the doctors had established a satisfactory balance between work and family responsibilities, although a substantial number were overworked in order to provide an income for their families or meet the needs of their communities. Thirty-six percent of female rural general practitioners and 56% of female rural specialists preferred to work fewer hours. Female general practitioners with responsibility for children were more than twice as likely as female general practitioners without children to be in a salaried position and less likely to be a practice partner. The changes needed to attract and retain women in rural practice include a place for everyone in the doctor's family, flexible practice structures, mentoring by women doctors and financial and personal recognition. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Women make up less than a quarter of the rural general practice workforce and an even smaller percentage of the specialist rural medical workforce. As a result their experiences are not well articulated in research on rural medical practice and their needs are not well represented in policies and programs for rural doctors. The incoming cohort of rural general practitioners has a majority of women and it is essential that the practice styles and needs of women doctors are understood in order to attract and retain women in rural medicine. This survey identifies some of the effects of family responsibilities on the work practices of female rural doctors and the changes needed to the structure of rural practice to include the way women work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15023221     DOI: 10.1111/j.1038-5282.2004.00557.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Rural Health        ISSN: 1038-5282            Impact factor:   1.662


  6 in total

Review 1.  International approaches to rural generalist medicine: a scoping review.

Authors:  Nicholas Schubert; Rebecca Evans; Kristine Battye; Tarun Sen Gupta; Sarah Larkins; Lachlan McIver
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2018-11-21

2.  Nature of association between rural background and practice location: a comparison of general practitioners and specialists.

Authors:  Matthew R McGrail; John S Humphreys; Catherine M Joyce
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Longitudinal rural clerkships: increased likelihood of more remote rural medical practice following graduation.

Authors:  Denese E Playford; Asha Nicholson; Geoffrey J Riley; Ian B Puddey
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Medical student selection criteria as predictors of intended rural practice following graduation.

Authors:  Ian B Puddey; Annette Mercer; Denese E Playford; Sue Pougnault; Geoffrey J Riley
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Faculties to Support General Practitioners Working Rurally at Broader Scope: A National Cross-Sectional Study of Their Value.

Authors:  Matthew R McGrail; Belinda G O'Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Incentives for retaining and motivating health workers in Pacific and Asian countries.

Authors:  Lyn N Henderson; Jim Tulloch
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2008-09-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.