Anders Ekedahl1, Niclas Månsson. 1. Department of Community Medicine, Lund University, Sweden. anders.ekedahl@apoteket.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of and the reasons for unclaimed prescriptions, primary non-compliance, after automated transmittals to pharmacies. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 3 health care districts (population 240,000) in the southernmost of Sweden on unclaimed electronic prescriptions (e-prescriptions), transmitted to 21 pharmacies during the period of 3 months (2000) and semi-structured interview study with patients not claiming their e-prescriptions transmitted to 4 pharmacies during a period of 3 weeks (2001). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of unclaimed e-prescriptions of total number of (dispensed and unclaimed) e-prescriptions and reasons for primary non-compliance. RESULTS: In total, 2171 (2.4%) e-prescriptions remained unclaimed at the pharmacies. The peak non-redemption rate was observed for those 15-24 years old (5.5%). The lowest rate was observed for those 65-74 years old. Men had a higher non-redemption rate than women. The highest rate for men was observed 25-34 years old (6.6%). Drugs for the musculoskeletal system (ATC group M) had higher non-redemption rates than expected (3.9%), and antibiotics (ATC-group J) lower (1.7%). Adolescents and young adults, 15-24 years old, had high non-compliance rates for drugs for the musculoskeletal system (14%) and anti-asthmatic drugs (11%). Of 78 interviewed patients, not claiming their e-prescriptions, 61% reported no need to have the prescription dispensed. However, unintentional non-compliance was reported by 28%, most of them were not aware that a prescription had been transmitted to the pharmacy. Thirteen percent reported that non-redemption had given further medical problems or made obtaining a new prescription necessary. CONCLUSION: Primary non-compliance was generally low, but there were differences related to age, gender and type of drugs. The most common reason reported for non-redemption was that the prescription was not needed, but some patients were unaware that prescriptions were issued and transmitted to the pharmacy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of and the reasons for unclaimed prescriptions, primary non-compliance, after automated transmittals to pharmacies. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 3 health care districts (population 240,000) in the southernmost of Sweden on unclaimed electronic prescriptions (e-prescriptions), transmitted to 21 pharmacies during the period of 3 months (2000) and semi-structured interview study with patients not claiming their e-prescriptions transmitted to 4 pharmacies during a period of 3 weeks (2001). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of unclaimed e-prescriptions of total number of (dispensed and unclaimed) e-prescriptions and reasons for primary non-compliance. RESULTS: In total, 2171 (2.4%) e-prescriptions remained unclaimed at the pharmacies. The peak non-redemption rate was observed for those 15-24 years old (5.5%). The lowest rate was observed for those 65-74 years old. Men had a higher non-redemption rate than women. The highest rate for men was observed 25-34 years old (6.6%). Drugs for the musculoskeletal system (ATC group M) had higher non-redemption rates than expected (3.9%), and antibiotics (ATC-group J) lower (1.7%). Adolescents and young adults, 15-24 years old, had high non-compliance rates for drugs for the musculoskeletal system (14%) and anti-asthmatic drugs (11%). Of 78 interviewed patients, not claiming their e-prescriptions, 61% reported no need to have the prescription dispensed. However, unintentional non-compliance was reported by 28%, most of them were not aware that a prescription had been transmitted to the pharmacy. Thirteen percent reported that non-redemption had given further medical problems or made obtaining a new prescription necessary. CONCLUSION: Primary non-compliance was generally low, but there were differences related to age, gender and type of drugs. The most common reason reported for non-redemption was that the prescription was not needed, but some patients were unaware that prescriptions were issued and transmitted to the pharmacy.
Authors: Theresa I Shireman; Pamela C Heaton; Wendy E Gay; Robert J Cluxton; Charles J Moomaw Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Andrew J Karter; Melissa M Parker; Matthew D Solomon; Courtney R Lyles; Alyce S Adams; Howard H Moffet; Mary E Reed Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Miriam Qvarnström; Thomas Kahan; Helle Kieler; Lena Brandt; Jan Hasselström; Kristina Bengtsson Boström; Karin Manhem; Per Hjerpe; Björn Wettermark Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Paul E M Muijrers; Rob Janknegt; Jildou Sijbrandij; Richard P T M Grol; J André Knottnerus Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2004-10-26 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Michael A Fischer; Margaret R Stedman; Joyce Lii; Christine Vogeli; William H Shrank; M Alan Brookhart; Joel S Weissman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 5.128