PURPOSE: Interstitial cystitis (IC) may require surgical treatment in a minority of patients in whom conservative treatment failed. This treatment includes enterocystoplasty (ECP), or continent or incontinent urinary diversion with or without cystourethrectomy. Patients with IC who underwent ECP or continent urinary diversion (CUD) occasionally have recurrent pain in the augmented bladder or continent pouch. In these patients a new ileal conduit is frequently constructed. Using part of the continent urinary diversion or bladder augmentation patch to make the ileal conduit has been reported. However, there may be some concern with performing the procedure in patients with IC because of the theoretical risk of continued pain in the converted ileal segment. We evaluated the role of conduit formation using retubularized bowel from ECP or CUD in patients with IC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11 patients with a mean age of 45 years underwent conduit formation using the augmentation patch of ECP or part of the continent urinary reservoir. Patients were followed by history, physical examination, laboratory tests and urography. RESULTS: Followup was 20 to 80 months. One patient continued to have pelvic pain. None of the patients had residual pain in the conduit. One patient had intermittent pain in the conduit 32 months after conversion. Two patients had ureteral obstruction requiring ureteral reimplantation revision. No patient complained of new gastrointestinal problems. CONCLUSIONS: Retubularization of a previously used bowel segment from ECP or CUD to form a urinary conduit seems to be an acceptable alternative in patients with IC.
PURPOSE:Interstitial cystitis (IC) may require surgical treatment in a minority of patients in whom conservative treatment failed. This treatment includes enterocystoplasty (ECP), or continent or incontinent urinary diversion with or without cystourethrectomy. Patients with IC who underwent ECP or continent urinary diversion (CUD) occasionally have recurrent pain in the augmented bladder or continent pouch. In these patients a new ileal conduit is frequently constructed. Using part of the continent urinary diversion or bladder augmentation patch to make the ileal conduit has been reported. However, there may be some concern with performing the procedure in patients with IC because of the theoretical risk of continued pain in the converted ileal segment. We evaluated the role of conduit formation using retubularized bowel from ECP or CUD in patients with IC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11 patients with a mean age of 45 years underwent conduit formation using the augmentation patch of ECP or part of the continent urinary reservoir. Patients were followed by history, physical examination, laboratory tests and urography. RESULTS: Followup was 20 to 80 months. One patient continued to have pelvic pain. None of the patients had residual pain in the conduit. One patient had intermittent pain in the conduit 32 months after conversion. Two patients had ureteral obstruction requiring ureteral reimplantation revision. No patient complained of new gastrointestinal problems. CONCLUSIONS: Retubularization of a previously used bowel segment from ECP or CUD to form a urinary conduit seems to be an acceptable alternative in patients with IC.