Literature DB >> 15017206

Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.

Ignacio F San Francisco1, Meredith M Regan, Aria F Olumi, William C DeWolf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the prognostic significance of clinical and pathological variables on outcome following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in a cohort of patients in the post-prostate specific antigen (PSA) era.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and pathological data on a cohort of 476 patients who underwent RRP for localized prostate cancer between January 1990 and July 2001 by 1 urologist (WCD). Median age, preoperative PSA and followup were 61 years, 5.8 ng/ml and 49 months, respectively. We used Cox proportional hazard modeling to evaluate the prognostic significance of clinical and pathological variables for cancer recurrence, defined as 2 successive PSA determinations 0.3 ng/ml or greater.
RESULTS: Of the 476 patients 53 (11%) had recurrence. Estimated cancer nonprogression probability was 86% (95% CI 83 to 90) and 76% (95% CI 68 to 86) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Two multivariate analyses were performed. The first analysis, using only preoperative indicators, found that the percent of biopsy cores positive for cancer and biopsy Gleason score were the best predictive indicators of recurrence. The second multivariate analysis, using preoperative and postoperative indicators, found that the percent of biopsy cores positive for cancer, RRP Gleason score and the combined pathological stage/margin status variable were the best predictive indicators of recurrence. PSA was not found to be an important predictor of recurrence on either multivariate analysis. Patients with a percent of biopsy cores in the upper half of the distribution (greater than 28% positive) were at significantly increased risk for recurrence compared with those in the lower half of the distribution (28% or less positive) (HR 3.86, p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The percent of cores positive for cancer was a better predictor of cancer recurrence than PSA in this post-PSA era RRP series. In addition, surgical Gleason score and pathological stage/surgical margins were also independent predictors of cancer recurrence after RRP. These 3 predictors are displayed in a nomogram-type format to summarize estimated 5 and 10-year recurrence-free probabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15017206     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000118690.05943.c0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging (sixth and seventh editions) for clinically localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and comparison with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk-stratification method.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Tianyu Li; Karthik Devarajan; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer imaging and staging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) approach.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

3.  Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Joseph W Basler
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Association of RNASEL and 8q24 variants with the presence and aggressiveness of hereditary and sporadic prostate cancer in a Hispanic population.

Authors:  Ignacio F San Francisco; Pablo A Rojas; Verónica Torres-Estay; Susan Smalley; Javier Cerda-Infante; Viviana P Montecinos; Claudia Hurtado; Alejandro S Godoy
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 5.310

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.