Literature DB >> 15016020

Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes.

K Karpinia1, I Magnusson, C Gibbs, M C K Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current interest in the assessment of probing attachment level measurements has been stimulated by recent introduction of novel periodontal probes as well as by the reclassification of periodontal diseases. Clinical attachment level (CAL) is currently the "gold standard" for diagnosing and monitoring periodontal diseases. AIM: To evaluate the performance of the newly introduced cementoenamel junction (CEJ) Probe in detecting CAL using the CEJ as a fixed reference point, and to compare the CEJ Probe with the Florida Disk Probe and a standard Manual Probe (North Carolina Probe).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three examiners probed 12 periodontal patients to determine intra- and inter-consistency of both the probes and the examiners, over a 4-week time interval. Subjects ranged in age from 22 to 74 years. The experimental design was structured to balance the intra- and inter-examiner consistency at the same site during the two visits.
RESULTS: Using the PROC MIXED of SAS, a strong interaction (p<0.001) between the examiner and probes was found. The consistency of probing (repeatability of measurements) depended upon the type of periodontal probe used as well as the skill (experience) of the examiner. Overall, the CEJ Probe displayed a more consistent performance. The CEJ Probe demonstrated greater intra-examiner consistency than the Disk Probe for two examiners (p<0.01). The CEJ Probe also showed increased inter-examiner consistency (p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The CEJ Probe has the potential to offer the dental team an efficient, accurate mechanism to chart and monitor attachment level measurements over time. Additional studies, using large numbers of examiners, are needed to assess more clearly the performance of each individual probe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15016020     DOI: 10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00464.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  7 in total

1.  Photodynamic therapy as an adjunctive treatment for chronic periodontitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Evaluation of an Electronic Periodontal Probe Versus a Manual Probe.

Authors:  Antonio Renatus; Lars Trentzsch; Antje Schönfelder; Fabian Schwarzenberger; Holger Jentsch
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

3.  Effects of different manual periodontal probes on periodontal measurements.

Authors:  Birte Holtfreter; Dietrich Alte; Christian Schwahn; Moïse Desvarieux; Thomas Kocher
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  Comparative evaluation of accuracy of periodontal probing depth and attachment levels using a Florida probe versus traditional probes.

Authors:  Nitin Gupta; S K Rath; Parul Lohra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-10-23

5.  Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a new computerized cemento-enamel junction probe.

Authors:  R Deepa; Shobha Prakash
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-01

6.  Comparative evaluation of probing depth and clinical attachment level using a manual probe and Florida probe.

Authors:  Amandeep Kour; Ashish Kumar; Komal Puri; Manish Khatri; Mansi Bansal; Geeti Gupta
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2016 May-Jun

7.  Comparative assessment of conventional periodontal probes and CEJ handpiece of electronic probes in the diagnosis and primary care of periodontal disease.

Authors:  Harshita Bareja; Monika Bansal; P G Naveen Kumar
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-02-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.