Literature DB >> 15014213

Minimum energy single-shock internal atrial defibrillation in sheep.

Amy M Goodman1, Merlise A Clyde, Donald S Burdick, Salim F Idriss, Patrick D Wolf.   

Abstract

Well-tolerated internal atrial defibrillation shocks must be below the pain threshold, which has been estimated to be less than 1 Joule. Defibrillation of the atria with low energy is made possible by delivering shocks at the low end of the defibrillation dose-response curve. We studied low-energy defibrillation in sheep to test the hypothesis that the energy that defibrillates the atria 10% of the time (ED10) is less than 1 Joule. The ED10 was estimated in seven sheep with rapid pacing induced chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). Low-energy defibrillation shocks were delivered from coronary sinus (CS) to superior vena cava (SVC) and the ED10 and ED50 (energy that defibrillates the atria 50% of the time) were then calculated using logistic regression. The mean ratio of ED10 to ED50 was 0.50, indicating that on average, the ED10 was equal to half of the ED50. ED10 shocks had energies ranging from 1.2 to 5.8 Joules. These results suggest that painless single-shock low-energy defibrillation may not be feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15014213     DOI: 10.1023/B:JICE.0000019266.09648.f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  23 in total

1.  Initial clinical experience with ambulatory use of an implantable atrial defibrillator for conversion of atrial fibrillation. Metrix Investigators.

Authors:  E G Daoud; C Timmermans; C Fellows; R Hoyt; R Lemery; K Dawson; G M Ayers
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-09-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  An up-down Bayesian, defibrillation efficacy estimator.

Authors:  A T Compos; R A Malkin; R E Ideker
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Assessment of global atrial fibrillation organization to optimize timing of atrial defibrillation.

Authors:  T H Everett; J R Moorman; L C Kok; J G Akar; D E Haines
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The defibrillation success rate versus energy relationship: Part I--Curve fitting and the most efficient defibrillation energy.

Authors:  B E Gliner; Y Murakawa; N V Thakor
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Atrial defibrillation thresholds of electrode configurations available to an atrioventricular defibrillator.

Authors:  M E Benser; G P Walcott; C R Killingsworth; S D Girouard; M M Morris; R E Ideker
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-08

6.  Clinical shock tolerability and effect of different right atrial electrode locations on efficacy of low energy human transvenous atrial defibrillation using an implantable lead system.

Authors:  N S Lok; C P Lau; H F Tse; G M Ayers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Internal atrial defibrillation in humans. Improved efficacy of biphasic waveforms and the importance of phase duration.

Authors:  R A Cooper; E E Johnson; J M Wharton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Successful atrial defibrillation with very-low-energy shocks by means of temporary epicardial wire electrodes.

Authors:  B L Cmolik; J Oritz; G M Ayers; J H Lee; A S Geha; A L Waldo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Dose-response relationship for successful internal atrial defibrillation.

Authors:  Hung-Fat Tse; Chu-Pak Lau; Gregory M Ayers
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Clinical efficacy and safety of atrial defibrillation using biphasic shocks and current nonthoracotomy endocardial lead configurations.

Authors:  S Saksena; A Prakash; L Mangeon; S Varanasi; T Kolettis; P Mathew; P De Groot; R Mehra; R B Krol
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian quantitative electrophysiology and its multiple applications in bioengineering.

Authors:  Roger C Barr; Loren W Nolte; Andrew E Pollard
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.