Literature DB >> 15013722

Prevalence of bone marrow micrometastases in esophagogastric cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Paul Ryan1, Seán McCarthy, Jacquie Kelly, J Kevin Collins, Colum Dunne, Liam Grogan, Oscar Breathnach, Fergus Shanahan, P Declan Carey, Thomas N Walsh, Gerald C O'Sullivan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow micrometastases are present in a high proportion of patients undergoing curative resection for esophagogastric cancer. The incorporation of preoperative systemic therapies into these patients' treatment is widely practiced. This study investigates the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on the incidence of micrometastases and the viability of detected tumor cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rib bone marrow was obtained from patients (n = 106) in three centers, who were selected for potentially curative resection. Patients received neoadjuvant CRT plus surgery (n = 55), or surgery alone (n = 51). To detect micrometastases, mononuclear cells were isolated from fresh marrow and immediately stained immunohistochemically with an anti-cytokeratin-18 antibody using the APAAP technique. Tumor cell viability was assessed by immunohistochemical staining of marrow cell cultures for cytokeratin-positive cells.
RESULTS: Micrometastases were detected in fresh marrow in 42% (23/55) of patients who received neoadjuvant CRT plus surgery, and in 67% (34/51) of patients treated with surgery alone. Viable tumor cells were demonstrated in 10 of 18 marrow cultures from CRT plus surgery cases. In this patient subset, combination of results of staining fresh and cultured marrow significantly increased micromet detection to 78%.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with esophagogastric cancer have disseminated viable tumor cells at time of surgery, irrespective of pre-operative treatment. The use of marrow culture in parallel with fresh marrow staining may increase the detection of micrometastases. The persistence of tumor cells resistant to systemic therapy may explain why these regimens fail in a majority of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15013722     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2003.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

1.  Lymph node, peritoneal and bone marrow micrometastases in gastric cancer: Their clinical significance.

Authors:  John Griniatsos; Othon Michail; Nikoletta Dimitriou; Ioannis Karavokyros
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-02-15

Review 2.  [Minimal residual tumor in gastrointestinal carcinoma. Relevance to prognosis and oncologic surgical consequences].

Authors:  S Gretschel; A Bembenek; T Schulze; W Kemmner; P M Schlag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Carsten N Gutt; Vasile V Bintintan; Jörg Köninger; Beat P Müller-Stich; Michael Reiter; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  From biocontrol to cancer, probiotics and beyond.

Authors:  Colum Dunne
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.269

5.  Induction of autophagy by drug-resistant esophageal cancer cells promotes their survival and recovery following treatment with chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Tracey R O'Donovan; Gerald C O'Sullivan; Sharon L McKenna
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 16.016

6.  The effects of preoperative chemotherapy on isolated tumour cells in the blood and bone marrow of gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  P Kolodziejczyk; A Pituch-Noworolska; G Drabik; J Kulig; A Szczepanik; M Sierzega; A Gurda; T Popiela; M Zembala
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.