Literature DB >> 15013504

Optimising the visual feedback technique for improving upright stance maintenance by delaying its display: behavioural effects on healthy adults.

P Rougier1.   

Abstract

The visual feedback technique (VFB) is recognized by several studies as a valuable tool for re-establishing the balance functions. However, one former study has highlighted the fact that the increased control induced by this technique infer both favourable (the amplitudes of the horizontal motions of the centre of gravity (CoG(h)) are diminished) and unfavourable features (the vertical difference between the CoG(h) motions and centre of pressure (CoP) trajectories are enhanced). One means to decrease these CoP-CoG(v) motions is to delay their display on the screen of the monitor. To assess these behavioural effects, 16 healthy adults were evaluated with various delays from 0 to 1200 ms. CoP displacements, measured through a force platform, were decomposed into two elementary motions: CoG(h) and the difference CoP-CoG(v). A fractional Brownian motion modelling of these motions allowed to determine from which distance and for how long the corrective process takes over and to what extent the motion is controlled. Compared to the VFB real time condition, increasing the delay induces some effects mainly on the CoP-CoG(v) motions which are largely diminished, the most striking effect appearing for delays exceeding 600 ms. Despite the lower forces these reduced amplitudes infer to control body sways, the amplitudes of the CoG(h) motions tend to increase slightly. Considered as a whole, whilst retaining the beneficial aspects of VFB without delay and significantly suppressing the unfavourable features, the data suggests that the method of delaying the screen display optimises the VFB technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15013504     DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00056-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  8 in total

1.  Compatibility of postural behavior induced by two aspects of visual feedback: time delay and scale display.

Authors:  P Rougier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Relative efficacy of various strategies for visual feedback in standing balance activities.

Authors:  Michael W Kennedy; Charles R Crowell; Aaron D Striegel; Michael Villano; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of Dynamic Sitting Exercise with Delayed Visual Feedback in the Early Post-Stroke Phase: A Pilot Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Masahide Inoue; Kazu Amimoto; Kohei Shida; Daisuke Sekine; Daichi Hasegawa; Kazuhiro Fukata; Yuji Fujino; Shigeru Makita; Hidetoshi Takahashi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-20

4.  The Effect of Continuous and Discretized Presentations of Concurrent Augmented Visual Biofeedback on Postural Control in Quiet Stance.

Authors:  Carmen D'Anna; Maurizio Schmid; Daniele Bibbo; Maurizio Bertollo; Silvia Comani; Silvia Conforto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visual reliance for balance control in older adults persists when visual information is disrupted by artificial feedback delays.

Authors:  Ting Ting Yeh; Tyler Cluff; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Voluntarily controlled but not merely observed visual feedback affects postural sway.

Authors:  Shu Imaizumi; Tomohisa Asai; Kentaro Hiromitsu; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Recent Considerations on Gaming Console Based Training for Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Antonio Celesti; Vincenzo Cimino; Antonino Naro; Simona Portaro; Maria Fazio; Massimo Villari; Rocco Salvatore Calabró
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kręcisz; Michał Kuczyński
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.