Literature DB >> 1501170

Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth.

W S Eakle1, M Staninec, A M Lacy.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether amalgam bonded to tooth structure with an adhesive resin cement can increase the fracture resistance of restored teeth. Extracted paired upper premolars were prepared for G.V. Black type mesioocclusodistal amalgam restorations. In one tooth of each pair (the experimental group), the enamel walls were etched with phosphoric acid and were painted with an adhesive resin (Panavia), and amalgam was condensed and carved. For the other tooth in each pair (the control group), amalgam was placed in the same manner but was not etched and lined with resin. The teeth were thermocycled and mounted for testing and then were loaded until fracture. A significant difference (p less than 0.05, the paired Student's t-test) was found in the force needed to fracture the bonded amalgam group (70.5 +/- 21.6 kg) compared with that needed to fracture the conventional amalgam group (60.3 +/- 16.8 kg). SEM examination of fractures at the interface occurred predominantly within the resin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1501170     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90325-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  10 in total

1.  In vitro evaluation of the effect of post system and length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated human anterior teeth.

Authors:  Sahil Jindal; Ritu Jindal; Sandeep Mahajan; Rohini Dua; Namita Jain; Sunila Sharma
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars: An In-vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Pr Pradeep; Vc Sunil Kumar; Sunil Rao Bantwal; Gurinderjeet Singh Gulati
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-12-26

3.  In-vitro study of the adhesive strengths of brackets on metals, ceramic and composite. Part 2: Bonding to porcelain and composite resin.

Authors:  P G Jost-Brinkmann; S Can; C Drost
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Prashant Monga; Vivek Sharma; Sukesh Kumar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2009-10

5.  Cusp fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with the bonded amalgam technique using various luting agents.

Authors:  Shivaughn M Marchan; Larry Coldero; Daniel White; William A J Smith; Reisha N Rafeek
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2008-12-25

6.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with direct composite restorations.

Authors:  Maryam Moezizadeh; Nastaran Mokhtari
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-07

7.  Comparison of the push-out shear bond strength of four types of glass ionomers when used to bond amalgam: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Vinod Babu Mathew; S Ramachandran; R Indira; P Shankar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-10

8.  Comparative evaluation of the reinforcing effect of different post systems in the restoration of endodontically treated human anterior teeth at two different lengths of post space preparation- an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sahil Jindal; Ritu Jindal; Kanika Gupta; Sandeep Mahajan; Sunidhi Garg
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-03-31

9.  Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with modern restorative materials.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Hamouda; Salah H Shehata
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2011-11

10.  Micro-shear bond strength of universal adhesives used for amalgam repair with or without Alloy Primer.

Authors:  Hacer Balkaya; Sezer Demirbuga; Nazire Nurdan Çakir; Muhammed Karadas; Yahya Orcun Zorba
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 May-Jun
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.