Literature DB >> 15010496

Neural correlates of beauty.

Hideaki Kawabata1, Semir Zeki.   

Abstract

We have used the technique of functional MRI to address the question of whether there are brain areas that are specifically engaged when subjects view paintings that they consider to be beautiful, regardless of the category of painting (that is whether it is a portrait, a landscape, a still life, or an abstract composition). Prior to scanning, each subject viewed a large number of paintings and classified them into beautiful, neutral, or ugly. They then viewed the same paintings in the scanner. The results show that the perception of different categories of paintings are associated with distinct and specialized visual areas of the brain, that the orbito-frontal cortex is differentially engaged during the perception of beautiful and ugly stimuli, regardless of the category of painting, and that the perception of stimuli as beautiful or ugly mobilizes the motor cortex differentially.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15010496     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00696.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  146 in total

1.  The social evaluation of faces: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Peter Mende-Siedlecki; Christopher P Said; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli.

Authors:  Vanessa Era; Matteo Candidi; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neurophysiological correlates of embodiment and motivational factors during the perception of virtual architectural environments.

Authors:  Giovanni Vecchiato; Andrea Jelic; Gaetano Tieri; Anton Giulio Maglione; Federico De Matteis; Fabio Babiloni
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

4.  Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture.

Authors:  Oshin Vartanian; Gorka Navarrete; Anjan Chatterjee; Lars Brorson Fich; Helmut Leder; Cristián Modroño; Marcos Nadal; Nicolai Rostrup; Martin Skov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dynamics of brain networks in the aesthetic appreciation.

Authors:  Camilo J Cela-Conde; Juan García-Prieto; José J Ramasco; Claudio R Mirasso; Ricardo Bajo; Enric Munar; Albert Flexas; Francisco del-Pozo; Fernando Maestú
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli.

Authors:  B Calvo-Merino; C Urgesi; G Orgs; S M Aglioti; P Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neural evidence for reduced apprehensiveness of familiarized stimuli in a mere exposure paradigm.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Discrete cortical regions associated with the musical beauty of major and minor chords.

Authors:  Miho Suzuki; Nobuyuki Okamura; Yousuke Kawachi; Manabu Tashiro; Hiroshi Arao; Takayuki Hoshishiba; Jiro Gyoba; Kazuhiko Yanai
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty.

Authors:  Camilo J Cela-Conde; Francisco J Ayala; Enric Munar; Fernando Maestú; Marcos Nadal; Miguel A Capó; David del Río; Juan J López-Ibor; Tomás Ortiz; Claudio Mirasso; Gisèle Marty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Orbitofrontal and hippocampal contributions to memory for face-name associations: the rewarding power of a smile.

Authors:  Takashi Tsukiura; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-03-30       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.