Literature DB >> 15010021

Surveillance and Treatment of Periampullary and Duodenal Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

J. Chad Johnson1, James A. DiSario, William M. Grady.   

Abstract

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have a cumulative lifetime risk of over 90% for developing duodenal adenomas, which are the precursor lesions for duodenal adenocarcinoma. Consequently, these patients have a 5% to 10% lifetime risk of periampullary or duodenal adenocarcinoma, making this the leading cause of cancer death in FAP patients who have had prophylactic colectomies. The increased relative risk of duodenal carcinoma in FAP patients and the poor outcomes associated with the treatment of advanced duodenal cancer have led to the development of prevention strategies for this cancer in the setting of FAP. It is generally accepted that surveillance for duodenal adenomas and adenocarcinomas should be included in the management of patients with FAP, although there are few data from clinical trials that demonstrate the effectiveness of surveillance strategies or chemoprevention for the prevention of death from duodenal cancer. Prospective case series have shown that endoscopic surveillance with endoscopic or surgical treatment of high-risk lesions in the duodenal or periampullary region can be performed with successful removal of the at-risk lesion(s). Surveillance should begin at about 21 years of age and should be performed using both an end-viewing and a side-viewing upper endoscope. An interval of 3 to 5 years between examinations appears to be adequate if no polyposis is evident. Once polyposis develops, an interval of 1 to 3 years between screenings for mild polyposis is appropriate. Patients with denser polyposis or larger adenomas are recommended to undergo examination every 6 to 12 months because of their increased risk of developing duodenal adenocarcinoma. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy with sulindac, a nonselective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor, or celecoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor, may be of benefit after the development of duodenal polyposis by inducing the regression or stabilization of the polyposis, although there is limited evidence from randomized, controlled trials to support its routine use. Almost all cases of adenocarcinoma occur in patients with advanced polyposis (Spigelman stage IV disease), and approximately 33% of this group will go on to develop adenocarcinoma if left untreated. The most definitive procedure for reducing the risk of adenocarcinoma is surgical resection of the ampulla and/or duodenum. Pancreaticoduodenectomy or pancreas-sparing duodenectomy are appropriate surgical therapies that are believed to substantially reduce the risk of developing periampullary adenocarcinoma. However, these procedures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including the risk of inducing desmoid tumor formation in FAP patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 15010021     DOI: 10.1007/s11938-004-0028-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  54 in total

1.  Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy determines length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  A S Rosemurgy; M Bloomston; F M Serafini; B Coon; M M Murr; L C Carey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Prospective randomized study of sulindac versus calcium and calciferol for upper gastrointestinal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  F Seow-Choen; V Vijayan; V Keng
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Effect of sulindac on small polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  H S Debinski; J Trojan; K P Nugent; A D Spigelman; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Pancreas-preserving duodenectomy in the management of duodenal familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Matthew F Kalady; Bryan M Clary; Douglas S Tyler; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Upper gastrointestinal pathology in familial adenomatous polyposis: results from a prospective study of 102 patients.

Authors:  P Domizio; I C Talbot; A D Spigelman; C B Williams; R K Phillips
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor, on duodenal polyposis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  R K S Phillips; M H Wallace; P M Lynch; E Hawk; G B Gordon; B P Saunders; N Wakabayashi; Y Shen; S Zimmerman; L Godio; M Rodrigues-Bigas; L-K Su; J Sherman; G Kelloff; B Levin; G Steinbach
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  G A Porter; P W Pisters; C Mansyur; A Bisanz; K Reyna; P Stanford; J E Lee; D B Evans
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Suppression of intestinal polyp development by low-fat and high-fiber diet in Apc(delta716) knockout mice.

Authors:  K Hioki; N Shivapurkar; H Oshima; O Alabaster; M Oshima; M M Taketo
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. DAF Project Group.

Authors:  S Bülow; T Alm; O Fausa; R Hultcrantz; H Järvinen; H Vasen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Guidance on gastrointestinal surveillance for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, familial adenomatous polypolis, juvenile polyposis, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

Authors:  M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  7 in total

1.  Management of ampullary tumours in children: still a challenge.

Authors:  P Fernandez-Eire; J L Vazquez Castelo; M Herreros Villaraviz; B Fernandez Caamaño; J Gonzalez-Carreró; F Ausania
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  In the beginning there was colectomy: current surgical options in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Daniel R McGrath; Allan D Spigelman
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 3.  Duodenal adenocarcinoma: Advances in diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Elizabeth George; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-27

Review 4.  Duodenal adenoma surveillance in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Fábio Guilherme Campos; Marianny Sulbaran; Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro; Carlos Augusto Real Martinez
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-10

5.  The role of chromoendoscopy in the surveillance of the duodenum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Massimo Picasso; Rosangela Filiberti; Sabrina Blanchi; Massimo Conio
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Collaborating genomic, transcriptomic and microbiomic alterations lead to canine extreme intestinal polyposis.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Tianfang Wang; Micah A Bishop; John F Edwards; Hang Yin; Stephen Dalton; Laura K Bryan; Shaying Zhao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-06-26

7.  Linked color imaging can improve the visibility of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.

Authors:  Kenichiro Okimoto; Daisuke Maruoka; Tomoaki Matsumura; Mamoru Tokunaga; Tatsuya Kaneko; Hirotaka Oura; Naoki Akizue; Yuki Ohta; Keiko Saito; Makoto Arai; Jun Kato; Naoya Kato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.