Literature DB >> 15009785

Contextualizing medical decisions to individualize care: lessons from the qualitative sciences.

Saul J Weiner1.   

Abstract

Clinical decision making can be described as answering one question: "What is the best next thing for this patient at this time?" In addition to incorporating clinical information, research evidence, and patient preferences, the process requires considering contextual factors that are unique to each patient and relevant to their care. The failure to do so, thereby compromising that care, can be called a "contextual error." Although proponents of evidence-based clinical decision making and many scholars of the medical interview emphasize the importance of individualizing care, no operational definition is provided for the concept, nor is any methodology proposed for the interpretation of clinically relevant patient-specific variables. By conceptualizing the physician-patient encounter as a participant-observer case study with an N of 1, this essay describes how existing approaches to studying social systems can provide clinicians with a systematic approach to individualizing their clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15009785      PMCID: PMC1492155          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30261.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  16 in total

Review 1.  How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.

Authors:  K J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Mindful practice.

Authors:  R M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The science of patient-centered care.

Authors:  R M Epstein
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Empathy in medical education and patient care.

Authors:  M Hojat; S Mangione; J S Gonnella; T Nasca; J J Veloski; G Kane
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice.

Authors:  R Brian Haynes; P J Devereaux; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  ACP J Club       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

6.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice.

Authors:  R Brian Haynes; P J Devereaux; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-08

8.  Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; C Goldman; C J Rosenquist; A Arango; C J Cole; S J Lee; B M Wolfe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings.

Authors:  W Levinson; R Gorawara-Bhat; J Lamb
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The patient-physician relationship. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust.

Authors:  R Charon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  27 in total

1.  Following the clues: teaching medical students to explore patients' contexts.

Authors:  Britta M Thompson; Cayla R Teal; Stephen M Scott; Shewanna N Manning; Eugenia Greenfield; Rachel Shada; Paul Haidet
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-07-31

2.  Older adults with CKD and acute kidney failure: do we know enough for critical shared decision making?

Authors:  Amy W Williams
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change.

Authors:  Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Debra L Scammon; Norman J Waitzman; Peter F Cronholm; Jacqueline R Halladay; David L Driscoll; Leif I Solberg; Clarissa Hsu; Ming Tai-Seale; Vanessa Hiratsuka; Sarah C Shih; Michael D Fetters; Christopher G Wise; Jeffrey A Alexander; Diane Hauser; Carmit K McMullen; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Manasi A Tirodkar; Laura Schmidt; Katrina E Donahue; Michael L Parchman; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  A taxonomy for contextual information in electronic health records.

Authors:  Charlene R Weir; Nancy Staggers; Kristina Doing-Harris; Robert Dunlea; Teresa McCormick; Robyn Barrus
Journal:  NI 2012 (2012)       Date:  2012-06-23

5.  Substance use among persons with homeless experience in primary care.

Authors:  Erin J Stringfellow; Theresa W Kim; Adam J Gordon; David E Pollio; Richard A Grucza; Erika L Austin; N Kay Johnson; Stefan G Kertesz
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.716

6.  A science of connectedness.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  [The diagnostic concept in family medicine: a view of the landscape. The diagnosis in family medicine].

Authors:  José Luis Turabián; Benjamín Pérez Franco
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 1.137

8.  Development of the Primary Care Quality-Homeless (PCQ-H) instrument: a practical survey of homeless patients' experiences in primary care.

Authors:  Stefan G Kertesz; David E Pollio; Richard N Jones; Jocelyn Steward; Erin J Stringfellow; Adam J Gordon; Nancy K Johnson; Theresa A Kim; Shanette G Daigle; Erika L Austin; Alexander S Young; Joya G Chrystal; Lori L Davis; David L Roth; Cheryl L Holt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Understanding Patients' Preferences for Referrals to Specialists for an Asymptomatic Condition.

Authors:  Robert Dunlea; Leslie Lenert
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  A conditional model of evidence-based decision making.

Authors:  Paul R Falzer; Melissa D Garman
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.