Stefan G Kertesz1, David E Pollio, Richard N Jones, Jocelyn Steward, Erin J Stringfellow, Adam J Gordon, Nancy K Johnson, Theresa A Kim, Shanette G Daigle, Erika L Austin, Alexander S Young, Joya G Chrystal, Lori L Davis, David L Roth, Cheryl L Holt. 1. *Birmingham VA Medical Center, School of Medicine †Department of Social Work, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL ‡Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, RI §University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Health Related Professions, Birmingham, AL ∥George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO ¶VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA #Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL **Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, Boston, MA ††Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL ‡‡VA Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research Education and Clinic Center (MIRECC) §§Department of Psychiatry, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA ∥∥Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL ¶¶Johns Hopkins University, Center on Aging and Health, Baltimore ##University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Homeless patients face unique challenges in obtaining primary care responsive to their needs and context. Patient experience questionnaires could permit assessment of patient-centered medical homes for this population, but standard instruments may not reflect homeless patients' priorities and concerns. OBJECTIVES: This report describes (a) the content and psychometric properties of a new primary care questionnaire for homeless patients; and (b) the methods utilized in its development. METHODS: Starting with quality-related constructs from the Institute of Medicine, we identified relevant themes by interviewing homeless patients and experts in their care. A multidisciplinary team drafted a preliminary set of 78 items. This was administered to homeless-experienced clients (n=563) across 3 VA facilities and 1 non-VA Health Care for the Homeless Program. Using Item Response Theory, we examined Test Information Function (TIF) curves to eliminate less informative items and devise plausibly distinct subscales. RESULTS: The resulting 33-item instrument (Primary Care Quality-Homeless) has 4 subscales: Patient-Clinician Relationship (15 items), Cooperation among Clinicians (3 items), Access/Coordination (11 items), and Homeless-specific Needs (4 items). Evidence for divergent and convergent validity is provided. TIF graphs showed adequate informational value to permit inferences about groups for 3 subscales (Relationship, Cooperation, and Access/Coordination). The 3-item Cooperation subscale had lower informational value (TIF<5) but had good internal consistency (α=0.75) and patients frequently reported problems in this aspect of care. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic application of qualitative and quantitative methods supported the development of a brief patient-reported questionnaire focused on the primary care of homeless patients and offers guidance for future population-specific instrument development.
BACKGROUND: Homeless patients face unique challenges in obtaining primary care responsive to their needs and context. Patient experience questionnaires could permit assessment of patient-centered medical homes for this population, but standard instruments may not reflect homeless patients' priorities and concerns. OBJECTIVES: This report describes (a) the content and psychometric properties of a new primary care questionnaire for homeless patients; and (b) the methods utilized in its development. METHODS: Starting with quality-related constructs from the Institute of Medicine, we identified relevant themes by interviewing homeless patients and experts in their care. A multidisciplinary team drafted a preliminary set of 78 items. This was administered to homeless-experienced clients (n=563) across 3 VA facilities and 1 non-VA Health Care for the Homeless Program. Using Item Response Theory, we examined Test Information Function (TIF) curves to eliminate less informative items and devise plausibly distinct subscales. RESULTS: The resulting 33-item instrument (Primary Care Quality-Homeless) has 4 subscales: Patient-Clinician Relationship (15 items), Cooperation among Clinicians (3 items), Access/Coordination (11 items), and Homeless-specific Needs (4 items). Evidence for divergent and convergent validity is provided. TIF graphs showed adequate informational value to permit inferences about groups for 3 subscales (Relationship, Cooperation, and Access/Coordination). The 3-item Cooperation subscale had lower informational value (TIF<5) but had good internal consistency (α=0.75) and patients frequently reported problems in this aspect of care. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic application of qualitative and quantitative methods supported the development of a brief patient-reported questionnaire focused on the primary care of homeless patients and offers guidance for future population-specific instrument development.
Authors: R D Hays; J A Shaul; V S Williams; J S Lubalin; L D Harris-Kojetin; S F Sweeny; P D Cleary Journal: Med Care Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Stephen W Hwang; Joanna J M Ueng; Shirley Chiu; Alex Kiss; George Tolomiczenko; Laura Cowan; Wendy Levinson; Donald A Redelmeier Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Joseph O Merrill; Lorna A Rhodes; Richard A Deyo; G Alan Marlatt; Katharine A Bradley Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sarinnapha M Vasunilashorn; Dena Schulman-Green; Douglas Tommet; Tamara G Fong; Tammy T Hshieh; Edward R Marcantonio; Eran D Metzger; Eva M Schmitt; Patricia A Tabloski; Thomas G Travison; Yun Gou; Benjamin Helfand; Sharon K Inouye; Richard N Jones Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Erin J Stringfellow; Theresa W Kim; Adam J Gordon; David E Pollio; Richard A Grucza; Erika L Austin; N Kay Johnson; Stefan G Kertesz Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Leslie R M Hausmann; Gretchen L Haas; Maria K Mor; John P Cashy; James H Schaefer; Adam J Gordon Journal: Psychol Serv Date: 2017-05
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Leslie R M Hausmann; Stefan G Kertesz; Ying Suo; John P Cashy; Maria K Mor; Warren B P Pettey; James H Schaefer; Adam J Gordon; Adi V Gundlapalli Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Adam J Gordon; Sonya E Gabrielian; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; John R Blosnich; Allyson L Varley; Aerin J deRussy; Erika L Austin; April E Hoge; Young-Il Kim; Lillian Gelberg; Stefan G Kertesz Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Stefan G Kertesz; Aerin J deRussy; Young-Il Kim; April E Hoge; Erika L Austin; Adam J Gordon; Lillian Gelberg; Sonya E Gabrielian; Kevin R Riggs; John R Blosnich; Ann E Montgomery; Sally K Holmes; Allyson L Varley; David E Pollio; Adi V Gundlapalli; Audrey L Jones Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Allyson L Varley; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; Jocelyn Steward; Erin Stringfellow; Erika L Austin; Adam J Gordon; David Pollio; Aerin deRussy; April Hoge; Lillian Gelberg; Kevin Riggs; Theresa W Kim; Sonia L Rubens; Stefan G Kertesz Journal: Qual Health Res Date: 2020-01-02