Literature DB >> 15009124

The environmental and genetic regulation of obake expressivity: morphogenetic fields as evolvable systems.

Joel Atallah1, Ian Dworkin, Una Cheung, Aisha Greene, Bryant Ing, Lisa Leung, Ellen Larsen.   

Abstract

The morphogenetic field, a fundamental concept of classical embryology, is once again being invoked to describe developmental processes. Because the evolution of adult structures requires the modification of development, the ways in which morphogenetic fields can change over time may yield insights into evolutionary possibilities. We considered how the duplication/multiplication of a morphogenetic field in fruit flies, caused by the previously described obake (obk) mutation, is regulated by genetic and environmental factors. Mutations of genes in the canonical antenna-producing imaginal disc pathway suppressed duplication as expected, although the results suggested that other pathways might also be involved. Overgrowth mutations, expected to increase duplication, actually suppressed it. Mutations in the heat-shock protein gene Hsp83 did not uniformly enhance obk expressivity as hypothesized. Using third chromosomes extracted from wild-derived lines, natural genetic variation for modifiers of obk function was found to be extensive. Larval crowding suppressed the obk phenotype, but there was no evidence of trade-offs between body or head size and arista number. Our results suggest that a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors in the regulation of fields may be responsible for ample natural variation in the expressivity of adult phenotypes, affording multiple opportunities for selection and evolutionary modification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15009124     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142x.2004.04017.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  6 in total

1.  Genomic consequences of background effects on scalloped mutant expressivity in the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ian Dworkin; Erin Kennerly; David Tack; Jennifer Hutchinson; Julie Brown; James Mahaffey; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Causes and consequences of genetic background effects illuminated by integrative genomic analysis.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Sudarshan Chari; David Tack; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-beta signaling contributes to variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ian Dworkin; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Does your gene need a background check? How genetic background impacts the analysis of mutations, genes, and evolution.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Sudarshan Chari; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Genetic background and GxE interactions modulate the penetrance of a naturally occurring wing mutation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Joseph Lachance; Lawrence Jung; John R True
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  The Phenotypic Effects of Royal Jelly on Wild-Type D. melanogaster Are Strain-Specific.

Authors:  Stefanie L Morgan; Joseph A Seggio; Nara F Nascimento; Dana D Huh; Jasmin A Hicks; Katherine A Sharp; Jeffrey D Axelrod; Kevin C Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.