Literature DB >> 15005954

A comparison of narrative and table formats for presenting hypothetical health states to patients with gastrointestinal or pulmonary disease.

Holger J Schünemann1, Elisabeth Ståhl, Peggy Austin, Elie Akl, David Armstrong, Gordon H Guyatt.   

Abstract

Traditionally, quality-of-life researchers describe states of health for patients to rate either in narrative form or in table form, but evidence about which format patients prefer is limited. The authors performed 2 randomized studies to test whether patients prefer the table or narrative format and whether the format of presentation influences how patients rate health states. Approximately three-fourths of patients with gastrointestinal disease or chronic airflow limitation preferred the table format. There were no differences in patients' ratings of 3 described health states or of their own health. Investigators should consider using the table presentation for describing health states to subjects who are not familiar with these states of health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15005954     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X03261566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  6 in total

1.  Marker states and a health state prompt provide modest improvements in the reliability and validity of the standard gamble and rating scale in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Karen E Bremner; George Tomlinson; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Do clinical marker states improve responsiveness and construct validity of the standard gamble and feeling thermometer: a randomized multi-center trial in patients with chronic respiratory disease.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Roger Goldstein; M Jeffery Mador; Douglas McKim; Elisabeth Stahl; Lauren E Griffith; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Peggy Austin; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Impact of discussion on preferences elicited in a group setting.

Authors:  Ken Stein; Julie Ratcliffe; Ali Round; Ruairidh Milne; John E Brazier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  A pilot Internet "value of health" panel: recruitment, participation and compliance.

Authors:  Ken Stein; Matthew Dyer; Tania Crabb; Ruairidh Milne; Alison Round; Julie Ratcliffe; John Brazier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  The influence of demographic factors and health-related quality of life on treatment satisfaction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with esomeprazole.

Authors:  Alessio Degl' Innocenti; Gordon H Guyatt; Ingela Wiklund; Diane Heels-Ansdell; David Armstrong; Carlo A Fallone; Lisa Tanser; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Samer El-Dika; Naoki Chiba; Alan N Barkun; Peggy Austin; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Patients' values and preferences of the expected efficacy of hip arthroscopy for osteoarthritis: a protocol for a multinational structured interview-based study combined with a randomised survey on the optimal amount of information to elicit preferences.

Authors:  Yuqing Zhang; Kari A O Tikkinen; Thomas Agoritsas; Olufemi R Ayeni; Paul Alexander; Maha Imam; Daniel Yoo; Athanasios Tsalatsanis; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Lehana Thabane; Holger Schünemann; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.