Literature DB >> 15005460

Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology.

Diana Lucifero1, J Richard Chaillet, Jacquetta M Trasler.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest a possible link between human assisted reproductive technology and genomic imprinting disorders. Assisted reproductive technology includes the isolation, handling and culture of gametes and early embryos at times when imprinted genes are likely to be particularly vulnerable to external influences. Evidence of sex-specific differences in imprint acquisition suggests that male and female germ cells may be susceptible to perturbations in imprinted genes at specific prenatal and postnatal stages. Imprints acquired first during gametogenesis must be maintained during preimplantation development when reprogramming of the overall genome occurs. In this review, we will discuss both new developments in our understanding of genomic imprinting including the mechanisms and timing of imprint erasure, acquisition and maintenance during germ cell development and early embryogenesis as well as the implications of this research for future epigenetic studies in reproduction and assisted reproductive technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15005460     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmh002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  28 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on female reproduction: an ovarian perspective.

Authors:  Aparna Mahakali Zama; Mehmet Uzumcu
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 8.606

2.  Zebrafish models of germ cell tumor.

Authors:  Joanie C Neumann; Kate Lillard; Vanessa Damoulis; James F Amatruda
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.441

3.  Progress in human genetics.

Authors:  Sara M Mariani
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-12-07

4.  Assisted reproductive technologies do not alter mutation frequency or spectrum.

Authors:  Lee Caperton; Patricia Murphey; Yukiko Yamazaki; C Alex McMahan; Christi A Walter; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; John R McCarrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Further evidence of the safety of assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Zev Rosenwaks; Kristin Bendikson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Betaine homocysteine methyltransferase is active in the mouse blastocyst and promotes inner cell mass development.

Authors:  Martin B Lee; Megan Kooistra; Baohua Zhang; Sandy Slow; Amanda L Fortier; Timothy A Garrow; Michael Lever; Jacquetta M Trasler; Jay M Baltz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Blastocyst environment and its influence on offspring cardiovascular health: the heart of the matter.

Authors:  Adam J Watkins; Tom P Fleming
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Effects of In Vitro Maturation on Histone Acetylation in Metaphase II Oocytes and Early Cleavage Embryos.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Fang Le; Qi-Tao Zhan; Li Li; Min-Yue Dong; Guo-Lian Ding; Chen-Ming Xu; Shi-Wen Jiang; He-Feng Huang; Fan Jin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-20

10.  In vitro culture and somatic cell nuclear transfer affect imprinting of SNRPN gene in pre- and post-implantation stages of development in cattle.

Authors:  Joao Suzuki; Jacinthe Therrien; France Filion; Rejean Lefebvre; Alan K Goff; Lawrence C Smith
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.978

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.