Literature DB >> 15004649

Nonlinear hearing AIDS and verification of fitting targets.

David A Fabry1.   

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of initial verification of hearing aid gain and output for nonlinear hearing aids. Specifically, "urban legend" has it that nonlinear hearing aids with digital noise reduction circuitry may not be accurately measured using functional gain and/or probe microphone measures. Discussed are the advantages and disadvantages of both measurement strategies, and how they may be used to "acoustically match" hearing aids to individual patients. An evaluation protocol that employs both optimal aided thresholds and probe microphone measurements to assess gain, output, and audibility in hearing-impaired patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 15004649      PMCID: PMC4168920          DOI: 10.1177/108471380300700303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of a Revised Speech in Noise (RSIN) test.

Authors:  R M Cox; G A Gray; G C Alexander
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  B C Moore; M Huss; D A Vickers; B R Glasberg; J I Alcántara
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-08

3.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  T Y Ching; H Dillon; D Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Examination of two issues concerning functional gain measurements.

Authors:  D B Hawkins; A A Montgomery; R A Prosek; B E Walden
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1987-02

5.  Clinical ear canal probe tube measurements.

Authors:  D B Hawkins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The reliability of insertion gain measurements using probe microphones in the ear canal.

Authors:  A Ringdahl; A Leijon
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1984

7.  Real-ear-to-coupler difference predictions as a function of age for two coupling procedures.

Authors:  Marlene P Bagatto; Susan D Scollie; Richard C Seewald; K Shane Moodie; Brenda M Hoover
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  D P Pascoe
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1975 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: effects of high-frequency compensation.

Authors:  M W Skinner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

Review 2.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

3.  Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification-Part II: Acoustic Measures.

Authors:  Lorienne M Jenstad; Susan Marynewich; David R Stapells
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-31

4.  Comparison: real and simulated ear insertion gain.

Authors:  Patrícia Danieli Campos; Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli; Debora Viviane Ferrari
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.