Literature DB >> 1180471

Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects.

D P Pascoe.   

Abstract

Eight hearing-impaired subjects were tested with a binaural master hearing aid. This aid has "on-the-head" miniature transducers and has an adjustable frequency response. Five frequency responses were used, two of them were defined by their response in a 2-cm3 coupler: 1) uniform coupler gain (UCG), and 2) 6 dB per rise (6 dB). The other responses were defined in terms of functional gain (difference between unaided and aided thresholds): 3) uniform functional gain (UFG); 4 uniform hearing level (UHL); and 5) a simulation of a commercial hearing aid (AS). A significant difference between coupler and functional gain was seen. Discrimination was tested with a special closed-set word list which includes fifty monosyllabic words with a high percentage of voiceless phonemes. Discrimination scores were consistently better with the UHL response. The lowest scores were obtained with the AS response. The average difference in scores between these two responses was 18.4%. Further testing replicated these results and also compared the effects of a different type of word list phonetically balanced (PB); with these lists, the above-mentioned difference in scores was smaller in quiet (5.9%) but larger in noise (20.9%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1180471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  8 in total

1.  Reconsidering the concept of the aided threshold for nonlinear hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Francis Kuk; Carl Ludvigsen
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

2.  Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Evaluation of a New Algorithm to Optimize Audibility in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Noël Y Dwyer; Amy L Stein; Leo M Litvak
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-18

5.  Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Margaret W Skinner; Ruth A Litovsky; Michael J Strube; Francis Kuk
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Nonlinear hearing AIDS and verification of fitting targets.

Authors:  David A Fabry
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

7.  The master hearing aid.

Authors:  James R Curran; Jason A Galster
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-05-17

8.  Anatomical and Functional MRI Changes after One Year of Auditory Rehabilitation with Hearing Aids.

Authors:  M R Pereira-Jorge; K C Andrade; F X Palhano-Fontes; P R B Diniz; M Sturzbecher; A C Santos; D B Araujo
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.