Literature DB >> 15003034

Pregnancy exposure registries.

Dianne L Kennedy1, Kathleen Uhl, Sandra L Kweder.   

Abstract

Scientifically valid data on the safety of drug use during pregnancy are a significant public health need. Data are rarely available on the fetal effects of in utero exposure in human pregnancies, particularly when a drug is first marketed. Data from animal reproductive toxicology studies, which function as a screen for potential human teratogenicity, are usually all that is available in a product's labelling. For practising clinicians, translating known animal risks into an accurate assessment of teratogenic risks in their patients is very difficult, if not impossible. Without human data on the effects of in utero drug exposure, it is difficult for physicians and other healthcare providers (e.g. genetic counsellors) to adequately counsel patients about fetal risks. Therefore, a pregnant woman may decide to unnecessarily terminate a wanted pregnancy or forego needed drug therapy. In spite of the lack of data on the safety of drug use during human pregnancies, pregnant women are exposed to drugs either as prescribed therapy or inadvertently before pregnancy is known (over one-half of pregnancies are unplanned). Because little is known about the teratogenic potential of a drug in humans before marketing, post-marketing surveillance of drug use in pregnancy is critical to the detection of drug-induced fetal effects. The existing passive mechanism of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug effects is inadequate to routinely detect drug-induced fetal risks or lack of such risks. Therefore, post-marketing pregnancy exposure registries are being increasingly used to proactively monitor for major fetal effects and to describe margins of safety associated with drug exposure during pregnancy. However, differing methodological rigour has been applied to the development of pregnancy exposure registries. It is important that all pregnancy registries develop epidemiologically sound written study protocols a priori. It is only through the use of rigorous methodology and procedures that data from pregnancy exposure registries will withstand scientific scrutiny. Successful recruitment of an adequate number of exposed pregnancies, aggressive follow-up, and complete and accurate ascertainment of pregnancy outcome are critical attributes of a well-designed registry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15003034     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200427040-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  23 in total

1.  Trends in pregnancies and pregnancy rates by outcome: estimates for the United States, 1976-96.

Authors:  S J Ventura; W D Mosher; S C Curtin; J C Abma; S Henshaw
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 21       Date:  2000-01

2.  Guideline for the study and evaluation of gender differences in the clinical evaluation of drugs; notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1993-07-22

3.  Systematic identification of drugs that cause birth defects--a new opportunity.

Authors:  Allen A Mitchell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The interaction between dysmorphology and epidemiology: methodologic issues of lumping and splitting.

Authors:  M J Khoury; C A Moore; L M James; J F Cordero
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1992-02

5.  Postmarketing surveillance for human teratogenicity: a model approach.

Authors:  C D Chambers; S R Braddock; G G Briggs; A Einarson; Y R Johnson; R K Miller; J E Polifka; L K Robinson; K Stepanuk; K Lyons Jones
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  2001-11

6.  Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States: the Slone survey.

Authors:  David W Kaufman; Judith P Kelly; Lynn Rosenberg; Theresa E Anderson; Allen A Mitchell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A prospective study of early pregnancy loss.

Authors:  N J Ellish; K Saboda; J O'Connor; P C Nasca; E J Stanek; C Boyle
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Therapeutic drug use during pregnancy: a comparison in four European countries. OECM Working Group. Occupational Exposures and Congenital Anomalies.

Authors:  C De Vigan; H E De Walle; S Cordier; J Goujard; R Knill-Jones; S Aymé; E Calzolari; F Bianchi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  The Organization of Teratology Information Services (OTIS) Registry Study.

Authors:  A R Scialli
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  A North American Registry for Epilepsy and Pregnancy, a unique public/private partnership of health surveillance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.864

View more
  17 in total

1.  Social media mining for birth defects research: A rule-based, bootstrapping approach to collecting data for rare health-related events on Twitter.

Authors:  Ari Z Klein; Abeed Sarker; Haitao Cai; Davy Weissenbacher; Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Probabilistic record linkage for monitoring the safety of artemisinin-based combination therapy in the first trimester of pregnancy in Senegal.

Authors:  Stephanie Dellicour; Philippe Brasseur; Per Thorn; Oumar Gaye; Piero Olliaro; Malik Badiane; Andy Stergachis; Feiko O ter Kuile
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Performing Drug Safety Research During Pregnancy and Lactation: Biomedical HIV Prevention Research as a Template.

Authors:  Richard H Beigi; Lisa Noguchi; Gina Brown; Jeanna Piper; D Heather Watts
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Long-term effects of exposure to disease-modifying drugs in the offspring of mothers with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Yara D Fragoso; Tarso Adoni; Soniza V Alves-Leon; Nério D Azambuja; Amilton A Barreira; Joseph B B Brooks; Denise S D Carneiro; Margarete J Carvalho; Rinaldo Claudino; Elizabeth R Comini-Frota; Renan B Domingues; Alessandro Finkelzstejn; Paulo D Gama; Maria C B Giacomo; Sidney Gomes; Marcus V M Goncalves; Anderson K Grzesiuk; Damacio R Kaimen-Maciel; Maria F Mendes; Nivea M O Morales; Rogério R Morales; Andre Muniz; Regina M Papais-Alvarenga; Monica K F Parolin; Sonia B F Ribeiro; Heloisa H Ruocco; Fabio Siquineli; Elza D Tosta
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Prescribing without evidence - pregnancy.

Authors:  Simon H L Thomas; Laura M Yates
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Assessment of congenital anomalies in infants born to pregnant women enrolled in clinical trials.

Authors:  Sonja A Rasmussen; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Omar A Abdul-Rahman; Leyla Sahin; Carey R Petrie; Kim M Keppler-Noreuil; Sharon E Frey; Robin M Mason; Mirjana Nesin; John C Carey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  A situational analysis of pharmacovigilance plans in the Global Fund Malaria and U.S. President's Malaria Initiative proposals.

Authors:  Andy Stergachis; Rebecca J K Bartlein; Alexander Dodoo; Jude Nwokike; S Patrick Kachur
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 8.  Update on the Teratogenicity of Maternal Mycophenolate Mofetil.

Authors:  Lisa A Coscia; Dawn P Armenti; Ryan W King; Nicole M Sifontis; Serban Constantinescu; Michael J Moritz
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2015-06

Review 9.  Pregnancy exposure registries for assessing antimalarial drug safety in pregnancy in malaria-endemic countries.

Authors:  Stephanie Dellicour; Feiko O ter Kuile; Andy Stergachis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Monitoring and evaluation of malaria in pregnancy - developing a rational basis for control.

Authors:  Bernard J Brabin; Marian Warsame; Marian Wasame; Ulrika Uddenfeldt-Wort; Stephanie Dellicour; Jenny Hill; Sabine Gies
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.