Literature DB >> 15002629

Inside the triple helix: technology transfer and commercialization in the life sciences.

Eric G Campbell1, Joshua B Powers, David Blumenthal, Brian Biles.   

Abstract

The transfer and subsequent application of academic research results has demonstrable benefits for health care, researchers, universities, companies, and local economies. Nonetheless, at least three general concerns exist: bias in the reporting of results, limited revenues from these activities, and the lack of data to evaluate technology transfer activities. Future efforts with regard to technology transfer in the life sciences will need to recognize its importance without ignoring concerns or overestimating benefits. Next steps include better monitoring of university-industry relationships, the development of a better data system, the dissemination of best practices in technology transfer management, and evaluation of national technology-transfer policies.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15002629     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  3 in total

1.  Life-science research within US academic medical centers.

Authors:  Darren E Zinner; Eric G Campbell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Nonindustry-sponsored preclinical studies on statins yield greater efficacy estimates than industry-sponsored studies: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David Krauth; Andrew Anglemyer; Rose Philipps; Lisa Bero
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  The Life Science Exchange: a case study of a sectoral and sub-sectoral knowledge exchange programme.

Authors:  Brian Lee Perkins; Rob Garlick; Jodie Wren; Jon Smart; Julie Kennedy; Phil Stephens; Gwyn Tudor; Jonathan Bisson; David V Ford
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-04-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.