Literature DB >> 15000746

In vitro activities of Daptomycin, Linezolid, and Quinupristin-Dalfopristin against a challenge panel of Staphylococci and Enterococci, including vancomycin-intermediate staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

Laura A Jevitt1, Amanda J Smith, Portia P Williams, Patti M Raney, John E McGowan, Fred C Tenover.   

Abstract

We assessed the in vitro activities of daptomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin (QD) against a contemporary challenge panel of 88 staphylococcal and 90 enterococcal isolates. The staphylococci selected included vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and coagulasenegative staphylococci. Enterococcal isolates included vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) containing either vanA, vanB1, or vanD. The MICs of daptomycin, linezolid, and QD were determined using commercial broth microdilution panels. All three VISA isolates were susceptible to daptomycin, linezolid, and QD. QD was the most active agent against staphylococcal isolates (MIC50 < or = 0.5 microg/ml and MIC90 = 1 microg/ml), including those with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin. QD was also the most active agent against VREF (MIC90 < or = 0.5 microg/ml). No differences were seen for susceptibility of vanA, vanB1, and vanD VREF strains for daptomycin, linezolid, or QD. Daptomycin was the most effective against E. faecalis. On the basis of manufacturer-suggested interpretive criteria, 92% of isolates were susceptible (MIC90 = 4 microg/ml). All isolates tested were susceptible to at least one antimicrobial agent for which interpretive criteria have been defined. Population analysis of three S. aureus isolates for which the daptomycin MICs were 8 microg/ml showed a pattern of homogeneous resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15000746     DOI: 10.1089/107662903322762833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Drug Resist        ISSN: 1076-6294            Impact factor:   3.431


  19 in total

1.  Assessment of two commercial susceptibility test methods for determination of daptomycin MICs.

Authors:  James H Jorgensen; Sharon A Crawford
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  High rate of resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin in Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates from Korea.

Authors:  Won Sup Oh; Kwan Soo Ko; Jae-Hoon Song; Mi Young Lee; Sulhee Park; Kyong Ran Peck; Nam Yong Lee; Choon-Kwan Kim; Hyuck Lee; Shin-Woo Kim; Hyun-Ha Chang; Yeon-Sook Kim; Sook-In Jung; Jun Seong Son; Joon-Sup Yeom; Hyun Kyun Ki; Gun-Jo Woo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Accuracy of six antimicrobial susceptibility methods for testing linezolid against staphylococci and enterococci.

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Portia P Williams; Sheila Stocker; Angela Thompson; Leigh Ann Clark; Brandi Limbago; Roberta B Carey; Susan M Poppe; Dean Shinabarger; John E McGowan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical progression of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis associated with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin.

Authors:  Holenarasipur R Vikram; Nancy L Havill; Laura M Koeth; John M Boyce
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  In-vitro antimicrobial activity of marine actinobacteria against multidrug resistance Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kumar S R Sathish; Venkata Bhaskara Rao Kokati
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Biomed       Date:  2012-10

6.  Multicenter evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion methods for differentiating daptomycin-susceptible from non-daptomycin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  Laura A Jevitt; Grace M Thorne; Maria M Traczewski; Ronald N Jones; John E McGowan; Fred C Tenover; Steven D Brown
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Characterisation of a Staphylococcus aureus strain with progressive loss of susceptibility to vancomycin and daptomycin during therapy.

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Scott W Sinner; Robert E Segal; Vanthida Huang; Shandline S Alexandre; John E McGowan; Melvin P Weinstein
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 8.  A current perspective on daptomycin for the clinical microbiologist.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Simon Pollett; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Evaluation of endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus developing nonsusceptibility to daptomycin.

Authors:  George Sakoulas; Warren Rose; Michael J Rybak; Satish Pillai; Jeff Alder; Robert C Moellering; George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Benjamin P Howden; John K Davies; Paul D R Johnson; Timothy P Stinear; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.