Literature DB >> 16954233

Multicenter evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion methods for differentiating daptomycin-susceptible from non-daptomycin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Laura A Jevitt1, Grace M Thorne, Maria M Traczewski, Ronald N Jones, John E McGowan, Fred C Tenover, Steven D Brown.   

Abstract

Daptomycin is a novel cyclic lipopeptide that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections associated with Staphylococcus aureus and other gram-positive pathogens and also staphylococcal bacteremia, including right-sided endocarditis. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) established "susceptible-only" interpretive criteria for broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion (DD) testing of daptomycin in 2005. However, a series of S. aureus isolates have been recovered with daptomycin MICs in the nonsusceptible range (i.e., MICs of >1 microg/ml). The objective of this study was to determine the ability of the Etest and DD methods to differentiate daptomycin-susceptible from nonsusceptible isolates of S. aureus compared to the results of the CLSI BMD reference method. There was a good correlation between Etest MIC results and the results of BMD among laboratories (r = 0.86 to 0.88), with 95.3% of the Etest MICs within a +/-1 log(2) dilution of the BMD MIC result. A total of 92 of 102 (90.2%) non-daptomycin-susceptible isolates of S. aureus identified by BMD in two participating laboratories were also classified as nonsusceptible by Etest. However, the very major and major error rates reported by one of the participating laboratories were 13.5 and 4.0%, respectively, primarily due to the absence of an intermediate category. The DD method, however, did not reliably differentiate daptomycin-susceptible from non-daptomycin-susceptible isolates. In 2005, daptomycin disks were voluntarily removed from the market by Cubist Pharmaceuticals. The disk diffusion breakpoints were subsequently removed from the CLSI M100 standard in 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16954233      PMCID: PMC1594672          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00665-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  32 in total

1.  Activity of daptomycin against Gram-positive pathogens: a comparison with other agents and the determination of a tentative breakpoint.

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews; J P Ashby
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  In vitro activities of daptomycin against 2,789 clinical isolates from 11 North American medical centers.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs; S D Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Resistance studies with daptomycin.

Authors:  J A Silverman; N Oliver; T Andrew; T Li
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Assessment of two commercial susceptibility test methods for determination of daptomycin MICs.

Authors:  James H Jorgensen; Sharon A Crawford
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus: what the infectious disease specialist needs to know.

Authors:  S K Fridkin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-12-13       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  In vitro activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin against Staphylococci and Enterococci, including vancomycin- intermediate and -resistant strains.

Authors:  M J Rybak; E Hershberger; T Moldovan; R G Grucz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparative In vitro activities of daptomycin and vancomycin against resistant gram-positive pathogens.

Authors:  D R Snydman; N V Jacobus; L A McDermott; J R Lonks; J M Boyce
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Evaluation of daptomycin susceptibility testing by Etest and the effect of different batches of media.

Authors:  P C Fuchs; A L Barry; S D Brown
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 9.  Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid: evidence and opinion.

Authors:  George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus?

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of commercial antimicrobial susceptibility test methods for testing of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococci against vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid.

Authors:  Stefan Riedel; Kar Mun Neoh; Stephen W Eisinger; Lisa M Dam; Tsigereda Tekle; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  A current perspective on daptomycin for the clinical microbiologist.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Simon Pollett; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  In vitro activity of daptomycin against Staphylococci isolated from bacteremia and community-onset skin and soft tissue infections in France: data from two nationwide studies.

Authors:  O Gallon; C Guillet-Caruba; B Lamy; F Laurent; F Doucet-Populaire; J-W Decousser
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Daptomycin: a review of its use in the management of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections and Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

Authors:  Philip I Hair; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium to daptomycin and other antibiotics.

Authors:  Z Samra; O Ofir; H Shmuely
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Daptomycin nonsusceptible enterococci: an emerging challenge for clinicians.

Authors:  Theodoros Kelesidis; Romney Humphries; Daniel Z Uslan; David A Pegues
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 20.999

7.  Stop Waiting for Tomorrow: Disk Diffusion Performed on Early Growth Is an Accurate Method for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing with Reduced Turnaround Time.

Authors:  Daniel M Webber; Meghan A Wallace; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 11.677

8.  Increasing rate of daptomycin non-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Izabela Błażewicz; Maciej Jaśkiewicz; Lidia Piechowicz; Damian Neubauer; Roman J Nowicki; Wojciech Kamysz; Wioletta Barańska-Rybak
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 9.  Mechanisms of Action for Antimicrobial Peptides With Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Functions.

Authors:  Nigare Raheem; Suzana K Straus
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.