Literature DB >> 15000542

The PIG in sPrInG: evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words.

Glyn W Humphreys1, Kate Mayall, Adam C G Cooper.   

Abstract

We introduce a novel procedure for investigating factors that determine selective attention to letters in words. Participants were presented with words (in Experiments 1 and 3) and nonwords (in Experiment 2) that contained a buried word whose letters differed in color relative to the other letters present (e.g., pig, in spring). The strings were presented in single case or mixed case, keeping the letters of the buried words in one case (SpRiNg). The time in which the whole stimulus was named was shorter for same-case than for mixed-case strings (for spring: spring < SpRiNg). In contrast, the time in which buried words were named was shorter in mixed- than in same-case strings (for pig: spring > SpRiNg). Across items, the effects of case mixing were negatively correlated across the two tasks. The positive effect of case mixing for buried words also occurred irrespective of whether the whole string was a word or a nonword, and there were contributions from similarity of both letter size and case. The results suggest that case mixing can facilitate selective attention to letters, which is otherwise disrupted by size- and case-based grouping across letter strings. The study provides evidence for letter grouping using size and case information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15000542     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  7 in total

1.  Driving attention with the top down: the relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.

Authors:  J Hodsoll; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

2.  Lexical recovery from extinction: Interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection.

Authors:  T Kumada; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects.

Authors:  K Mayall; G W Humphreys; A Olson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-08

6.  Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping.

Authors:  R A Rensink; J T Enns
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.

Authors:  D LaBerge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Eye position changes during reading fixations are spatially selective.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Matthew S Solomon; Bradley A Seymour; Ralph Radach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 1.886

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.