Literature DB >> 14998909

Effect of limited DNA methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Nathalie Beaujean1, Jane Taylor, John Gardner, Ian Wilmut, Richard Meehan, Lorraine Young.   

Abstract

Active demethylation of cytosine residues in the sperm genome before forming a functional zygotic nucleus is thought to be an important function of the oocyte cytoplasm for subsequent embryonic development in the mouse. Conversely, this event does not occur in the sheep or rabbit zygote and occurs only partially in the cow. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of limited methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on reprogramming somatic nuclei. Sheep fibroblast somatic nuclei were partially demethylated after electrofusion with recipient sheep oocytes and undergo a stepwise passive loss of DNA methylation during early development, as determined by 5-methylcytosine immunostaining on interphase embryonic nuclei. A similar decrease takes place with in vivo-derived sheep embryos up to the eight-cell stage, although nuclear transfer embryos exhibit a consistently higher level of methylation at each stage. Between the eight-cell and blastocyst stages, DNA methylation levels in nuclear transfer embryos are comparable with those derived in vivo, but the distribution of methylated DNA is abnormal in a high proportion. By correlating DNA methylation with developmental potential at individual stages, our results suggest that somatic nuclei that do not undergo rapid reorganization of their DNA before the first mitosis fail to develop within two to three cell cycles and that the observed methylation defects in early cleavage stages more likely occur as a direct consequence of failed nuclear reorganization than in failed demethylation capacity. However, because only embryos with reorganized chromatin appear to survive the 16-cell and morula stages, failure to demethylate the trophectoderm cells of the blastocyst is likely to directly impact on developmental potential by altering programmed patterns of gene expression in extra-embryonic tissues. Thus, both remodeling of DNA and epigenetic reprogramming appear critical for development of both fertilized and nuclear transfer embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14998909     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.026559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  47 in total

Review 1.  Why the apparent haste to clone humans?

Authors:  N Cobbe
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Exposure of mouse cumulus cell nuclei to porcine ooplasmic extract eliminates TATA box protein binding to chromatin, but has no effect on DNA methylation.

Authors:  Guo Qing Tong; Boon Chin Heng; Soon Chye Ng
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  DNA methylation pattern in pig in vivo produced embryos.

Authors:  Josef Fulka; Helena Fulka; Tomas Slavik; Konosuke Okada; Josef Fulka
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 4.  Nuclear transfer to eggs and oocytes.

Authors:  J B Gurdon; Ian Wilmut
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Connie C Wong; Kevin E Loewke; Nancy L Bossert; Barry Behr; Christopher J De Jonge; Thomas M Baer; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10-03       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  The evolving biology of cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Ian Wilmut; Gareth Sullivan; Ian Chambers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Gene expression of Dnmt1 isoforms in porcine oocytes, embryos, and somatic cells.

Authors:  Angelica M Giraldo; Kristi DeCourcy; Suyapa F Ball; Darin Hylan; David L Ayares
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Recent evolution of a TET-controlled and DPPA3/STELLA-driven pathway of passive DNA demethylation in mammals.

Authors:  Christopher B Mulholland; Atsuya Nishiyama; Joel Ryan; Ryohei Nakamura; Merve Yiğit; Ivo M Glück; Carina Trummer; Weihua Qin; Michael D Bartoschek; Franziska R Traube; Edris Parsa; Enes Ugur; Miha Modic; Aishwarya Acharya; Paul Stolz; Christoph Ziegenhain; Michael Wierer; Wolfgang Enard; Thomas Carell; Don C Lamb; Hiroyuki Takeda; Makoto Nakanishi; Sebastian Bultmann; Heinrich Leonhardt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Non-invasive imaging of human embryos to predict developmental competence.

Authors:  R A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Efficient production and cellular characterization of sheep androgenetic embryos.

Authors:  Federica Zacchini; Marta Czernik; Domenico Iuso; Paola Toschi; Fiorella di Egidio; Pier Augusto Scapolo; Pasqualino Loi; Grazyna Ptak
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 1.987

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.