Literature DB >> 14998681

Blood burden of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and its primary metabolite mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in pregnant and nonpregnant rats and marmosets.

Winfried Kessler1, Wanwiwa Numtip, Konstanze Grote, György A Csanády, Ibrahim Chahoud, Johannes G Filser.   

Abstract

A comparison of the dose-dependent blood burden of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP) in pregnant and nonpregnant rats and marmosets is presented. Sprague-Dawley rats and marmosets were treated orally with 30 or 500 mg DEHP/kg per day, nonpregnant animals on 7 (rats) and 29 (marmosets) consecutive days, pregnant animals on gestation days 14-19 (rats) and 96-124 (marmosets). In addition, rats received a single dose of 1000 mg DEHP/kg. Blood was collected up to 48 h after dosing. Concentrations of DEHP and MEHP in blood were determined by GC/MS. In rats, normalized areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) of DEHP were two orders of magnitude smaller than the normalized AUCs of the first metabolite MEHP. Metabolism of MEHP was saturable. Repeated DEHP treatment and pregnancy had only little influence on the normalized AUC of MEHP. In marmosets, most of MEHP concentration-time courses oscillated. Normalized AUCs of DEHP were at least one order of magnitude smaller than those of MEHP. In pregnant marmosets, normalized AUCs of MEHP were similar to those in nonpregnant animals with the exception that at 500 mg DEHP/kg per day, the normalized AUCs determined on gestation days 103, 117, and 124 were distinctly smaller. The maximum concentrations of MEHP in blood of marmosets were up to 7.5 times and the normalized AUCs up to 16 times lower than in rats receiving the same daily oral DEHP dose per kilogram of body weight. From this toxicokinetic comparison, DEHP can be expected to be several times less effective in the offspring of marmosets than in that of rats if the blood burden by MEHP in dams can be regarded as a dose surrogate for the MEHP burden in their fetuses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14998681     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  11 in total

1.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of human and animal evidence of prenatal diethylhexyl phthalate exposure and changes in male anogenital distance.

Authors:  David C Dorman; Weihsueh Chiu; Barbara F Hales; Russ Hauser; Kamin J Johnson; Ellen Mantus; Susan Martel; Karen A Robinson; Andrew A Rooney; Ruthann Rudel; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Susan L Schantz; Katrina M Waters
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.393

2.  Exposure Marker Discovery of Phthalates Using Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jen-Yi Hsu; Chia-Lung Shih; Pao-Chi Liao
Journal:  Mass Spectrom (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-03-24

3.  Determination of phthalates and their by-products in tissues of roach (Rutilus rutilus) from the Orge river (France).

Authors:  A S Valton; C Serre-Dargnat; M Blanchard; F Alliot; M Chevreuil; Marie Jeanne Teil
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  The PPARα-dependent rodent liver tumor response is not relevant to humans: addressing misconceptions.

Authors:  J Christopher Corton; Jeffrey M Peters; James E Klaunig
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 5.  Human body burdens of chemicals used in plastic manufacture.

Authors:  Holger M Koch; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Phthalate exposure and early thelarche.

Authors:  Richard H McKee
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Airborne environmental injuries and human health.

Authors:  Andrea T Borchers; Christopher Chang; Carl L Keen; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 8.  A reexamination of the PPAR-alpha activation mode of action as a basis for assessing human cancer risks of environmental contaminants.

Authors:  Kathryn Z Guyton; Weihsueh A Chiu; Thomas F Bateson; Jennifer Jinot; Cheryl Siegel Scott; Rebecca C Brown; Jane C Caldwell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy and Prenatal Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Commonly Used in Personal Care Products.

Authors:  Marissa Chan; Carol Mita; Andrea Bellavia; Michaiah Parker; Tamarra James-Todd
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-05-27

10.  Plastics derived endocrine disruptors (BPA, DEHP and DBP) induce epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of obesity, reproductive disease and sperm epimutations.

Authors:  Mohan Manikkam; Rebecca Tracey; Carlos Guerrero-Bosagna; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.