Literature DB >> 14996955

Risk factors in acquired faecal incontinence.

Peter J Lunniss1, Marc A Gladman, Franc H Hetzer, Norman S Williams, S Mark Scott.   

Abstract

Acquired faecal incontinence arising in the non-elderly population is a common and often devastating condition. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis in 629 patients (475 female) referred to a tertiary centre, to determine the relative importance of individual risk factors in the development of faecal incontinence, as demonstrated by abnormal results on physiological testing. Potential risk factors were identified in all but 6% of patients (7 female, 32 male). In women, the principal risk factor was childbirth (91%), and in most cases at least one vaginal delivery had met with complications such as perineal injury or the need for forceps delivery. Of the males, half had undergone anal surgery and this was the only identified risk factor in 59%. In many instances, assignment of cause was hampered by a long interval between the supposed precipitating event and the development of symptoms. Abnormalities of anorectal physiology were identified in 76% of males and 96% of females (in whom they were more commonly multiple). These findings add to evidence that occult damage to the continence mechanism, especially through vaginal delivery and anal surgery, can result in subsequent faecal incontinence, sometimes after an interval of many years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14996955      PMCID: PMC1079318          DOI: 10.1177/014107680409700303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  34 in total

1.  An epidemiological study to establish the prevalence of urinary symptoms and felt need in the community: the Leicestershire MRC Incontinence Study. Leicestershire MRC Incontinence Study Team.

Authors:  S Perry; C Shaw; P Assassa; H Dallosso; K Williams; K R Brittain; F Mensah; N Smith; M Clarke; C Jagger; C Mayne; C M Castleden; J Jones; C McGrother
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2000-09

Review 2.  Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience.

Authors:  Fernando Azpiroz; Paul Enck; William E Whitehead
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Investigation of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  G N Buchanan; T Nicholls; D Solanki; M A Kamm
Journal:  Hosp Med       Date:  2001-09

4.  Postpartum urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-25

5.  Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy: the nerve content of the uterine supporting ligaments.

Authors:  S A Butler-Manuel; L D Buttery; R P A'Hern; J M Polak; D P Barton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community.

Authors:  S Perry; C Shaw; C McGrother; R J Matthews; R P Assassa; H Dallosso; K Williams; K R Brittain; U Azam; M Clarke; C Jagger; C Mayne; C M Castleden
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Obstetric practice and faecal incontinence three months after delivery.

Authors:  C MacArthur; C M Glazener; P D Wilson; G P Herbison; H Gee; G D Lang; R Lancashire
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms associated with diabetes mellitus: a population-based survey of 15,000 adults.

Authors:  P Bytzer; N J Talley; M Leemon; L J Young; M P Jones; M Horowitz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-09-10

9.  Anal function: effect of pregnancy and delivery.

Authors:  C Chaliha; A H Sultan; J M Bland; A K Monga; S L Stanton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  A population-based study on bowel habits in a Swedish community: prevalence of faecal incontinence and constipation.

Authors:  S Walter; O Hallböök; R Gotthard; M Bergmark; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Faecal incontinence and health related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease patients: Findings from a tertiary care center in South Asia.

Authors:  Duminda Subasinghe; Navarathna Mudiyanselage Meththananda Navarathna; Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-08-06

Review 3.  Systematic review of surgical options for idiopathic megarectum and megacolon.

Authors:  Marc A Gladman; S Mark Scott; Peter J Lunniss; Norman S Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Long-term follow-up after combined fissurectomy and Botox injection for chronic anal fissures.

Authors:  Th Scholz; F H Hetzer; D Dindo; N Demartines; P A Clavien; D Hahnloser
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Coexistence of constipation and incontinence in children and adults.

Authors:  S Nurko; S M Scott
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.043

6.  Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.

Authors:  Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

7.  Natural progression of anal incontinence after childbirth.

Authors:  Johan Nordenstam; Daniel Altman; Sophia Brismar; Jan Zetterström
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-21

8.  Simple cutaneous advancement flap anoplasty for resistant chronic anal fissure: a prospective study.

Authors:  Pasquale Giordano; Gianpiero Gravante; Pietro Grondona; Boris Ruggiero; Theresa Porrett; Peter James Lunniss
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Evaluation of outcome of anorectal anomaly in childhood: the role of anorectal manometry and endosonography.

Authors:  A S Keshtgar; E Athanasakos; G S Clayden; H C Ward
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 10.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function.

Authors:  Emma V Carrington; S Mark Scott; Adil Bharucha; François Mion; Jose M Remes-Troche; Allison Malcolm; Henriette Heinrich; Mark Fox; Satish S Rao
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.