Literature DB >> 14996232

Intrathecal drug delivery for treatment of chronic low back pain: report from the National Outcomes Registry for Low Back Pain.

Timothy Deer1, Iva Chapple, Ashley Classen, Keith Javery, Valerie Stoker, Lisa Tonder, Kim Burchiel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To obtain data on patient demographics, clinical practices, and long-term outcomes for patients with chronic low back pain treated with implantable drug-delivery systems.
DESIGN: The National Outcomes Registry for Low Back Pain collected data at baseline, trialing, implant (or decision not to implant), and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Data were collected at all time points, regardless of implant status. OUTCOME MEASURES: Numeric pain ratings and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability scores from implanted patients were compared among baseline and 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Patients were also asked to rate their quality of life and satisfaction with the therapy.
RESULTS: Thirty-six physicians enrolled 166 patients to be trialed for drug-delivery systems. The trialing success rate was 93% (154 patients). In all, 136 patients (82%) were implanted. In the implant group, numeric pain ratings dropped by more than 47% for back pain and more than 31% for leg pain at the 12-month follow-up. More than 65% of implanted patients reduced their Oswestry scores by at least one level at their 12-month follow-ups compared with baseline. At 12-month follow-ups, 80% of implanted patients were satisfied with their therapy and 87% said they would undergo the procedure again.
CONCLUSIONS: Current clinical practices related to trialing of drug-delivery systems resulted in the majority of patients successfully trialed. At 12-month follow-ups, implanted patients experienced reductions in numeric back and leg pain ratings, improved Oswestry scores, and high satisfaction with the therapy. Copyright American Academy of Pain Medicine

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14996232     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2004.04011.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  13 in total

Review 1.  Intrathecal Analgesia for Chronic Refractory Pain: Current and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Catherine Smyth; Nadera Ahmadzai; Jason Wentzell; Ashley Pardoe; Andrew Tse; Tiffany Nguyen; Yvette Goddard; Shona Nair; Patricia A Poulin; Becky Skidmore; Mohammed T Ansari
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Ethical issues in using data from quality management programs.

Authors:  David R Nerenz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  History and present state of targeted intrathecal drug delivery.

Authors:  Syed Rizvi; Krishna Kumar
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2015

Review 4.  Managing Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in the Elderly: Intrathecal Therapy.

Authors:  Barbara Kleinmann; Tilman Wolter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  [Importance of intrathecal pain therapy].

Authors:  R Likar; W Ilias; H Kloimstein; A Kofler; H G Kress; J Neuhold; M M Pinter; M C Spendel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  Evidence and practice in spine registries.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Wilco C H Jacobs; Paul C Willems; Michel W J M Wouters; Marinus de Kleuver; Wilco C Peul; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 7.  Interventional Therapies for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Focused Review (Efficacy and Outcomes).

Authors:  Vikram B Patel; Ronald Wasserman; Farnad Imani
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-08-22

8.  Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)-The Implantable Systems Performance Registry (ISPR).

Authors:  David M Schultz; Aaron K Calodney; Alon Y Mogilner; Todd W Weaver; Michelle D Wells; E Katherine Stromberg; Mollie P Roediger; Peter E Konrad; John T Sasaki
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-10-12

9.  Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems (IDDS): The Implantable Systems Performance Registry (ISPR).

Authors:  Peter E Konrad; John M Huffman; Lisa M Stearns; Robert J Plunkett; Eric J Grigsby; E K Stromberg; Mollie P Roediger; Michelle D Wells; Todd W Weaver
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-10-12

10.  Safety and Efficacy of the Use of Intrathecal Morphine for Spinal Three Column Osteotomy.

Authors:  Jason R Audlin; Swamy Kurra; William Lavelle; Richard A Tallarico; Mike H Sun; Nathaniel R Ordway; Elizabeth A Demers Lavelle
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.