Literature DB >> 14992158

Women's recognition of the spontaneous onset of labor.

Mechthild M Gross1, Tanja Haunschild, Tina Stoexen, Viola Methner, Hans H Guenter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive research on the onset of labor, almost no data are available on women's perception of labor onset. We undertook a study to assess how women experience spontaneous onset of term labor.
METHODS: A semistructured questionnaire was given to 235 women admitted in spontaneous labor at term. Women noted when labor had started, whether and when membranes had ruptured, and answered an open question about how labor had announced itself. Two investigators independently subdivided women's experiences on how labor had started into 369 sampling units corresponding to 8 predefined categories.
RESULTS: Nearly two-thirds of the sampling units (63.4%) related to recurrent and nonrecurrent pain, and the ratio between the two types was higher for multiparas than for nulliparas. The number of women and sampling units were identical for each of the following categories: watery fluid (n = 47), blood-stained loss (n = 33), gastrointestinal symptoms (n = 10) and altered sleep patterns (n = 11); 22 sampling units relating to emotional upheaval were mentioned by 16 women. Although 33.6 percent of women experienced rupture of membranes before admission, only 21.6 percent associated it with their onset of labor, either alone (11.5%) or in association with other categories (10.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although women experience onset of labor in a variety of ways, for most it is a concrete event. Studies on duration of labor should take women's perception of onset of labor as a starting point rather than rely on surrogate measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14992158     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2003.00257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  6 in total

1.  Diagnosis of labor: a prospective study.

Authors:  Antonio Ragusa; Mona Mansur; Alberto Zanini; Massimo Musicco; Lilia Maccario; Giovanni Borsellino
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-08-11

Review 2.  Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.

Authors:  Shinobu Kobayashi; Nobutsugu Hanada; Masayo Matsuzaki; Kenji Takehara; Erika Ota; Hatoko Sasaki; Chie Nagata; Rintaro Mori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  Describing latent phase duration and associated characteristics among 1281 low-risk women in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Mia Ahlberg; Tekoa L King; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Jonathan M Snowden; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  The association between longer durations of the latent phase of labor and subsequent perinatal processes and outcomes among midwifery patients.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Nicole Carlson; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Development and validation of a tool for advising primiparous women during early labour: study protocol for the GebStart Study.

Authors:  Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin; Mechthild M Gross; Antonia N Mueller; Jessica Pehlke-Milde
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 6.  Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Sarah Munro; Devon Greyson; Mechthild M Gross; Vanora Hundley; Helen Spiby; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.