Literature DB >> 14990641

HER-2 testing and trastuzumab therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Elena B Elkin1, Milton C Weinstein, Eric P Winer, Karen M Kuntz, Stuart J Schnitt, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Trastuzumab therapy has been shown to benefit metastatic breast cancer patients whose tumors exhibit HER-2 protein overexpression or gene amplification. Several tests of varying accuracy and cost are available to identify candidates for trastuzumab. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of alternative HER-2 testing and trastuzumab treatment strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a decision analysis using a state-transition model to simulate clinical practice in a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old metastatic breast cancer patients. Outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Interventions included testing with the HercepTest (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) immunohistochemical assay alone, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) alone, and both tests, followed by trastuzumab and chemotherapy for patients with positive test results and chemotherapy alone for patients with negative test results.
RESULTS: In the base case, initial HercepTest with FISH confirmation of all positive results had an ICER of $125,000 per QALY gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness of initial FISH was $145,000 per QALY gained. Other strategies yielded the same or poorer effectiveness at a higher cost, or lower effectiveness at a lower cost, but with a less favorable ICER. These findings persisted under a range of assumptions, and only changes in test characteristics substantially altered results.
CONCLUSION: It is more cost-effective to use FISH alone or as confirmation of all positive HercepTest results, rather than using FISH to confirm only weakly positive results or using HercepTest alone. When multiple tests are available to identify treatment candidates, test characteristics may have a substantial impact on the aggregate costs and effectiveness of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14990641     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  54 in total

Review 1.  Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics: a critical and systematic review.

Authors:  William B Wong; Josh J Carlson; Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Tumour molecular profiling for deciding therapy-the French initiative.

Authors:  Frédérique Nowak; Jean-Charles Soria; Fabien Calvo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques.

Authors:  C M Ellis; M J Dyson; T J Stephenson; E L Maltby
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Analysis of HER2 gene amplification using an automated fluorescence in situ hybridization signal enumeration system.

Authors:  Rachel Stevens; Imad Almanaseer; Miguel Gonzalez; Derin Caglar; Ryan A Knudson; Rhett P Ketterling; Daniel S Schrock; Thomas A Seemayer; Julia A Bridge
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Di Palma; N Collins; C Faulkes; B Ping; G Ferns; B Haagsma; G Layer; M W Kissin; M G Cook
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Closing the evidence gap in the use of emerging testing technologies in clinical practice.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Stephanie Van Bebber
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2008-06

Review 8.  Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.

Authors:  Frauke Becker; Carla G van El; Dolores Ibarreta; Eleni Zika; Stuart Hogarth; Pascal Borry; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Jean Jacques Cassiman; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Shirley Hodgson; A Cécile J W Janssens; Helena Kaariainen; Michael Krawczak; Ulf Kristoffersson; Jan Lubinski; Christine Patch; Victor B Penchaszadeh; Andrew Read; Wolf Rogowski; Jorge Sequeiros; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Irene M van Langen; Helen Wallace; Ron Zimmern; Jörg Schmidtke; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Do economic evaluations of targeted therapy provide support for decision makers?

Authors:  Ilia L Ferrusi; Natasha B Leighl; Nathalie A Kulin; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Comparative effectiveness and health care spending--implications for reform.

Authors:  Milton C Weinstein; Jonathan A Skinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.