Literature DB >> 14990206

Adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

John O Schorge1, Lynne M Knowles, Jayanthi S Lea.   

Abstract

Cervical adenocarcinomas are increasing in incidence each year, comprising up to 25% of all cervical cancers diagnosed in the United States. This increase largely reflects the inherent difficulty in detecting glandular precursor lesions using current screening practices. However, there also appears to be a recent shift in the epidemiology of the disease process with younger women being diagnosed more frequently. Fertility-sparing surgery is an option for selected patients with adenocarcinoma in situ or stage IA(1) cervical adenocarcinoma. Simple hysterectomy should be performed at the completion of childbearing or when preserving fertility is not an issue. The treatment of choice for most women with stage IA(2) to IB(1) disease is radical hysterectomy. Fewer than 20% of patients will need adjuvant therapy and the cure rate is excellent. Primary radiation with weekly cisplatin may be the best option for patients with stage IB(2) to IIA cervical adenocarcinoma. Patients treated initially by primary radical surgery will almost certainly require postoperative chemoradiation because of high-risk surgical-pathologic features. Patients with stage IIB to IVA disease should also receive primary radiation with weekly cisplatin. Management of recurrence should be individualized, depending on the location of disease and the type of previous therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14990206     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-004-0044-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  54 in total

1.  Is there a difference in survival for IA1 and IA2 adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix?

Authors:  Harriet O Smith; Clifford R Qualls; Audrey A Romero; Joel C Webb; Maxine H Dorin; Luis A Padilla; Charles R Key
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: a prospective study of conization as definitive treatment.

Authors:  Erik Soegaard Andersen; Karsten Nielsen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  A P Vizcaino; V Moreno; F X Bosch; N Muñoz; X M Barros-Dios; D M Parkin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1998-02-09       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Phase III trial comparing radical radiotherapy with and without cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  R Pearcey; M Brundage; P Drouin; J Jeffrey; D Johnston; H Lukka; G MacLean; L Souhami; G Stuart; D Tu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Cervical adenocarcinoma, a novel combination chemotherapy with mitomycin C, etoposide, and cisplatin for advanced or recurrent disease.

Authors:  N Umesaki; R Izumi; H Fushiki; K Hasegawa; I Kono; M Nishida; H Noguchi; H Okuda; H Sugimori; K Takizawa; Y Udagawa; K Yamamoto; T Tanaka; K Noda
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Estimation of the duration of the preclinical phase of cervical adenocarcinoma suggests that there is ample opportunity for screening.

Authors:  S C Plaxe; S L Saltzstein
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Prospective trial of early feeding and bowel stimulation after radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  K Kraus; J Fanning
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Influence of histologic type and age on survival rates for invasive cervical carcinoma in Taiwan.

Authors:  R J Chen; Y H Lin; C A Chen; S C Huang; S N Chow; C Y Hsieh
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Prolonged oral etoposide in recurrent or advanced non-squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Peter G Rose; John A Blessing; Richard E Buller; Robert S Mannel; Kenneth D Webster
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  W A Peters; P Y Liu; R J Barrett; R J Stock; B J Monk; J S Berek; L Souhami; P Grigsby; W Gordon; D S Alberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  12 in total

1.  Distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas: is a 2-marker (Vim/CEA) panel enough?

Authors:  Chiung-Ling Liao; Jeng-Dong Hsu; Ming-Yung Lee; Lai-Fong Kok; Yi-Ju Li; Po-Hui Wang; Chung-Chin Yao; Chih-Ping Han
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Gastric-type Mucinous Carcinoma with an Abnormal Increase of CA199: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Xue-Qian Qian; Fen-Fen Wang; Yun Liang; Li-Li Chen; Xiao-Yun Wan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  p16 INK4 and CEA can be mutually exchanged with confidence between both relevant three-marker panels (ER/Vim/CEA and ER/Vim/p16 INK4) in distinguishing primary endometrial adenocarcinomas from endocervical adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.

Authors:  Chih-Ping Han; Ming-Yung Lee; Yeu-Sheng Tyan; Lai-Fong Kok; Chung-Chin Yao; Po-Hui Wang; Jeng-Dong Hsu; Szu-Wen Tseng
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Cytoplasmic Maspin Expression Correlates with Poor Prognosis of Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.

Authors:  Kanae Nosaka; Yasushi Horie; Tatsushi Shiomi; Hiroaki Itamochi; Tetsuro Oishi; Muneaki Shimada; Shinya Sato; Tomohiko Sakabe; Tasuku Harada; Yoshihisa Umekita
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.641

Review 5.  Gene discovery in cervical cancer : towards diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers.

Authors:  Cara M Martin; Louise Kehoe; Cathy O Spillane; John J O'Leary
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.074

6.  Comparison of outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in patients with surgically treated stage I-II cervical cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Yamauchi; Takeshi Fukuda; Takuma Wada; Masaru Kawanishi; Kenji Imai; Yasunori Hashiguchi; Tomoyuki Ichimura; Tomoyo Yasui; Toshiyuki Sumi
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15

7.  Multivariate prognostic analysis of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kato; Hidemichi Watari; Mahito Takeda; Masayoshi Hosaka; Takashi Mitamura; Noriko Kobayashi; Satoko Sudo; Masanori Kaneuchi; Masataka Kudo; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  Scoring mechanisms of p16INK4a immunohistochemistry based on either independent nucleic stain or mixed cytoplasmic with nucleic expression can significantly signal to distinguish between endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.

Authors:  Chiew-Loon Koo; Lai-Fong Kok; Ming-Yung Lee; Tina S Wu; Ya-Wen Cheng; Jeng-Dong Hsu; Alexandra Ruan; Kuan-Chong Chao; Chih-Ping Han
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study.

Authors:  Chiung-Ling Liao; Ming-Yung Lee; Yeu-Sheng Tyan; Lai-Fong Kok; Tina S Wu; Chiew-Loon Koo; Po-Hui Wang; Kuan-Chong Chao; Chih-Ping Han
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Prognostic value of histopathology and trends in cervical cancer: a SEER population study.

Authors:  Vincent Vinh-Hung; Claire Bourgain; Georges Vlastos; Gábor Cserni; Mark De Ridder; Guy Storme; Anne-Thérèse Vlastos
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.