Literature DB >> 14987328

High-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition following endoscopic therapy in the acute management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers in the USA and Canada: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

A N Barkun1, K Herba, V Adam, W Kennedy, C A Fallone, M Bardou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition has recently been shown, yet its cost-effectiveness remains poorly studied. AIM: To assess the cost-effectiveness of this approach separately for American and Canadian health care settings.
METHODS: A validated decision model included patients with bleeding ulcers after successful endoscopic haemostasis. Probabilities were determined from the literature, and charges and lengths of stay from national databases. A third-party payer perspective was adopted over a 30-day time horizon.
RESULTS: Re-bleeding rates were 5.9% for patients who received high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition and 22.9% for those who did not. Hospitalization costs for patients with and without re-bleeding were 11,802 US dollars and 7993 US dollars, and 5220 Canadian dollars and 2696 Canadian dollars, respectively. High-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition was more effective and less costly than the alternative of not administering it. The cost-effectiveness ratios for high-dose and no high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition were 9112 US dollars and 11,819 US dollars (3293 dollars and 4284 dollars for the Canadian case), respectively. Sensitivity and threshold analyses showed that the results were robust across a wide range of clinically relevant assumptions.
CONCLUSION: In the USA and Canada, administering high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibition for 3 days is both more effective and less costly than not doing so for patients with bleeding ulcers after successful endoscopic haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14987328     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2004.01808.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  20 in total

1.  High-dose vs low-dose proton pump inhibitors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liu-Cheng Wu; Yun-Fei Cao; Jia-Hao Huang; Cun Liao; Feng Gao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Doppler endoscopic probe as a guide to risk stratification and definitive hemostasis of peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Dennis M Jensen; Gordon V Ohning; Thomas O G Kovacs; Kevin A Ghassemi; Rome Jutabha; Gareth S Dulai; Gustavo A Machicado
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  A clinical guide to using intravenous proton-pump inhibitors in reflux and peptic ulcers.

Authors:  Sandy H Pang; David Y Graham
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.409

4.  Use of intravenous proton-pump inhibitors in a teaching hospital practice.

Authors:  Jacob G Hoover; Annabel L Schumaker; Kevin J Franklin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  The Stretta procedure versus proton pump inhibitors and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Dan Comay; Viviane Adam; Ediardo B da Silveira; Wendy Kennedy; Serge Mayrand; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 6.  Intravenous esomeprazole: a pharmacoeconomic profile of its use in the prevention of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Barriers to the implementation of practice guidelines in managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A qualitative approach.

Authors:  Sean M Hayes; Suzanne Murray; Martin Dupuis; Martin Dawes; Ian A Hawes; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Reassessment of Rebleeding Risk of Forrest IB (Oozing) Peptic Ulcer Bleeding in a Large International Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Dennis M Jensen; Stefan Eklund; Tore Persson; Henrik Ahlbom; Robert Stuart; Alan N Barkun; Ernest J Kuipers; Joachim Mössner; James Y Lau; Joseph J Sung; Jan Kilhamn; Tore Lind
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Partially covered self-expandable metal stents versus polyethylene stents for malignant biliary obstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Viviane Adam; Myriam Martel; Khalid AlNaamani; Peter L Moses
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-30

10.  Editorial: Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitors for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: What is the Most Cost-Effective Approach?

Authors:  Kathryn Peterson; David J Bjorkman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.