Literature DB >> 14985674

Mechanisms by which transcription can regulate somatic hypermutation.

B E Wright1, K H Schmidt, M F Minnick.   

Abstract

Mechanisms for somatic hypermutation (SHM) have proven elusive. An actively transcribed substrate was analyzed to elucidate the role of stem-loop structures (SLSs) in SHM. Analysis with a new computer algorithm indicates that the location and mutability of a base are regulated by: (a) the extent to which it is unpaired, (b) the degree to which it is exposed by stabilization of SLSs containing and flanking it, and (c) the level of transcription that drives supercoiling, which creates and stabilizes SLSs containing unpaired bases vulnerable to mutation. New mechanisms are described by which transcription can differentially stabilize SLSs harboring targeted bases and establish specific base exposure patterns. Assuming that transcription levels correlate with the magnitude of superhelicity induced and the lengths of ssDNA forming SLSs, this analysis accounts for the location of all mutable bases during SHM.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14985674     DOI: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Immun        ISSN: 1466-4879            Impact factor:   2.676


  11 in total

1.  Transcriptional de-repression and Mfd are mutagenic in stressed Bacillus subtilis cells.

Authors:  Holly Anne Martin; Mario Pedraza-Reyes; Ronald E Yasbin; Eduardo A Robleto
Journal:  J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01-13

2.  Ancient phylogenetic beginnings of immunoglobulin hypermutation.

Authors:  Jaroslav Kubrycht; Karel Sigler; Michal Růzicka; Pavel Soucek; Jirí Borecký; Petr Jezek
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Evaluation of molecular models for the affinity maturation of antibodies: roles of cytosine deamination by AID and DNA repair.

Authors:  Mala Samaranayake; Janusz M Bujnicki; Michael Carpenter; Ashok S Bhagwat
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  I. VH gene transcription creates stabilized secondary structures for coordinated mutagenesis during somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Barbara E Wright; Karen H Schmidt; Michael F Minnick; Nick Davis
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.407

5.  II. Correlations between secondary structure stability and mutation frequency during somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Barbara E Wright; Karen H Schmidt; Nick Davis; Aaron T Hunt; Michael F Minnick
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.407

6.  Stabilised DNA secondary structures with increasing transcription localise hypermutable bases for somatic hypermutation in IGHV3-23.

Authors:  Bhargavi Duvvuri; Venkata R Duvvuri; Jianhong Wu; Gillian E Wu
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.846

7.  G4-forming sequences in the non-transcribed DNA strand pose blocks to T7 RNA polymerase and mammalian RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  Silvia Tornaletti; Shaun Park-Snyder; Philip C Hanawalt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Post-translational regulation of activation-induced cytidine deaminase.

Authors:  Uttiya Basu; Andrew Franklin; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Gene Conversion-Like Events in the Diversification of Human Rearranged IGHV3-23*01 Gene Sequences.

Authors:  Bhargavi Duvvuri; Gillian E Wu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Advances in mechanisms of genetic instability related to hereditary neurological diseases.

Authors:  Robert D Wells; Ruhee Dere; Micheal L Hebert; Marek Napierala; Leslie S Son
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.