Literature DB >> 14985519

Why do workers behave unsafely at work? Determinants of safe work practices in industrial workers.

A M Garcia1, P Boix, C Canosa.   

Abstract

AIMS: To explore the relation between safety climate (workers' perceptions regarding management's attitudes towards occupational safety and health) and workers' behaviour at work.
METHODS: Cross sectional survey of workers at the pottery industry in Castellon, Spain. Sampling was stratified by plant size and workers' gender, according to data on the working population at this setting. A total of 734 production workers were interviewed. Information was collected on safety climate and workers' behaviour towards occupational risks with a specific questionnaire. A safety climate index (SCI, scale 0-100) was constructed adding scores for each item measuring safety climate in the questionnaire. Workers' unsafe behaviour was analysed for the different safety climate index levels.
RESULTS: Mean score for SCI was 71.90 (SD 19.19). There were no differences in SCI scores according to age, gender, education, children at charge, seniority at work, or type of employment. Small workplaces (<50 workers) showed significantly worse SCI (mean 67.23, SD 19.73) than the largest factories (>200 workers). Lower levels of SCI (SCI <50) were related to workers' unsafe behaviours (full/high accord with the statement "I excessively expose myself to hazards in my work", adjusted odds ratio ORa 2.79, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.88), and to lack of compliance with safety rules (ORa 12.83, 95% CI 5.92 to 27.80).
CONCLUSIONS: Safety climate measures workers' perception of organisational factors related to occupational health and safety (for example, management commitment to risk prevention or priorities of safety versus production). In this study these factors are strongly associated with workers' attitudes towards safety at work. Longitudinal studies can further clarify the relation between safety climate and workers' behaviour regarding occupational safety and health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14985519      PMCID: PMC1740724     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  9 in total

1.  Hospital safety climate and its relationship with safe work practices and workplace exposure incidents.

Authors:  R R Gershon; C D Karkashian; J W Grosch; L R Murphy; A Escamilla-Cejudo; P A Flanagan; E Bernacki; C Kasting; L Martin
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Testing the reliability and validity of a measure of safety climate.

Authors:  E Anderson; P M McGovern; L Kochevar; D Vesley; R Gershon
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.095

Review 3.  Organizational interventions: facing the limits of the natural science paradigm.

Authors:  A Griffiths
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  The safety climate and its relationship to safety practices, safety of the work environment and occupational accidents in eight wood-processing companies.

Authors:  U Varonen; M Mattila
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2000-11

Review 5.  Workplace organizational correlates of lost-time accident rates in manufacturing.

Authors:  H S Shannon; V Walters; W Lewchuck; J Richardson; L A Moran; T Haines; D Verma
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organizational safety.

Authors:  R Isla Díaz; D Díaz Cabrera
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1997-09

7.  The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model.

Authors:  R L Brown; H Holmes
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1986-12

Review 8.  Motivational and organizational factors affecting implementation of worker safety training.

Authors:  M K Lindell
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun

9.  Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications.

Authors:  D Zohar
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1980-02
  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  An impact evaluation of a federal mine safety training regulation on injury rates among US stone, sand, and gravel mine workers: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Authors:  Celeste Monforton; Richard Windsor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Factors associated with the activities of safety representatives in Spanish workplaces.

Authors:  Ana M García; Maria José López-Jacob; Isabel Dudzinski; Rafael Gadea; Fernando Rodrigo
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Predictors of hearing protection use in construction workers.

Authors:  Jane Edelson; Richard Neitzel; Hendrika Meischke; William Daniell; Lianne Sheppard; Bert Stover; Noah Seixas
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-06-16

4.  Gender and other factors associated with the use of hearing protection devices at work.

Authors:  Tatiane Costa Meira; Vilma Sousa Santana; Silvia Ferrite
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.106

5.  Self-reported safety practices and associated factors among employees of Dashen brewery share company, Gondar, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Solomon Tesfa Tezera; Daniel Haile Chercos; Awrajaw Dessie
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.646

6.  An analysis on the relationship between safety awareness and safety behaviors of healthcare professionals, Ankara/Turkey.

Authors:  Fatma Uzuntarla; Serhat Kucukali; Yasin Uzuntarla
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 7.  Occupational Health Hazards: Employer, Employee, and Labour Union Concerns.

Authors:  Oscar Rikhotso; Thabiso John Morodi; Daniel Masilu Masekameni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Perceptions of work environment priorities: Are there any differences by company size? An ecological study.

Authors:  Hasse Nordlöf; Katarina Wijk; Karl-Erik Westergren
Journal:  Work       Date:  2015

9.  Relationship Between Noise-Related Risk Perception, Knowledge, and the Use of Hearing Protection Devices Among Para Rubber Wood Sawmill Workers.

Authors:  Phayong Thepaksorn; Wattasit Siriwong; Richard L Neitzel; Ratana Somrongthong; Teeranee Techasrivichien
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2017-06-20

10.  Utilization of personal protective equipment and associated factors among building construction workers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019.

Authors:  Addisu Alehegn Alemu; Meseret Yitayew; Aklilu Azazeh; Sofia Kebede
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.