Tina M Saldana1, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Linda S Adair. 1. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3997, USA. am_siegariz@unc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary intake influences glucose tolerance status, yet the relation between macronutrient intake and the development of glucose intolerance during pregnancy has not been adequately examined. OBJECTIVE: We examined the relation between macronutrient intake early in pregnancy and the development of glucose intolerance. DESIGN: Data are from 1698 women in the Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition Study. Dietary intake during the second trimester was assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. Women were classified into 1 of 3 glucose categories: gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and normal glucose tolerance. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the relative risk of IGT and GDM, with adjustment for potential confounders. A series of models were specified to test alternate hypotheses about the relation of diet to risk of IGT or GDM. RESULTS: The overall prevalences of IGT and GDM in the cohort were 2.6% and 5.2%, respectively. The addition model showed that adding 100 kcal from carbohydrates to the diet was associated with a 12% decrease in risk of IGT and a 9% decrease in risk of GDM. The substitution model showed that substituting fat for carbohydrates (per each 1% of total calories) resulted in a significant increase in risk of both IGT and GDM [relative risk = 1.1 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.12) and 1.1 (1.02, 1.10), respectively]. Predicted probabilities of IGT and GDM were reduced by one-half with a 10% decrease in dietary fat and a 10% increase in carbohydrate. CONCLUSIONS: This study found an association between increased fat intake and the development of glucose abnormalities in pregnancy.
BACKGROUND: Dietary intake influences glucose tolerance status, yet the relation between macronutrient intake and the development of glucose intolerance during pregnancy has not been adequately examined. OBJECTIVE: We examined the relation between macronutrient intake early in pregnancy and the development of glucose intolerance. DESIGN: Data are from 1698 women in the Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition Study. Dietary intake during the second trimester was assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. Women were classified into 1 of 3 glucose categories: gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and normal glucose tolerance. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the relative risk of IGT and GDM, with adjustment for potential confounders. A series of models were specified to test alternate hypotheses about the relation of diet to risk of IGT or GDM. RESULTS: The overall prevalences of IGT and GDM in the cohort were 2.6% and 5.2%, respectively. The addition model showed that adding 100 kcal from carbohydrates to the diet was associated with a 12% decrease in risk of IGT and a 9% decrease in risk of GDM. The substitution model showed that substituting fat for carbohydrates (per each 1% of total calories) resulted in a significant increase in risk of both IGT and GDM [relative risk = 1.1 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.12) and 1.1 (1.02, 1.10), respectively]. Predicted probabilities of IGT and GDM were reduced by one-half with a 10% decrease in dietary fat and a 10% increase in carbohydrate. CONCLUSIONS: This study found an association between increased fat intake and the development of glucose abnormalities in pregnancy.
Authors: Paula C Chandler-Laney; Desti N Shepard; Camille R Schneider; Lee Anne Flagg; Wesley M Granger; Melissa S Mancuso; Joseph R Biggio; Barbara A Gower Journal: J Nutr Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Tarja I Kinnunen; Jatta Puhkala; Jani Raitanen; Suvi Ahonen; Minna Aittasalo; Suvi M Virtanen; Riitta Luoto Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Alison M Stuebe; Alison Wise; Thutrang Nguyen; Amy Herring; Kari E North; Anna Maria Siega-Riz Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Lisa Chasan-Taber; Bess H Marcus; Edward Stanek; Joseph T Ciccolo; David X Marquez; Caren G Solomon; Glenn Markenson Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.681